Comprehensive Energy Data Intelligence

Information About Energy Companies, Their Assets, Market Deals, Industry Documents and More...

The-Haynes-oil-and-gas-basin-and-its-importance

The Haynesville oil and gas basin is a significant shale gas-producing region located primarily in northwest Louisiana and eastern Texas in the United Statesб with some estimates suggesting it could contain up to 500 trillion cubic feet of recoverable natural gas.

The Haynesville basin has become a key source of natural gas production in the United States, helping to fuel the country's increasing demand for natural gas as a cleaner alternative to coal and oil. The basin's strategic location near major pipelines and liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminals has also made it an important source of natural gas for international markets.

Some of the key pipelines serving the region include:

  1. Gulf Crossing Pipeline: This pipeline spans approximately 357 miles and transports natural gas from the Barnett Shale in Texas to markets in the southeastern U.S., including Louisiana.
  2. Texas Eastern Transmission Pipeline: This pipeline stretches more than 9,000 miles and serves customers in the northeastern and southeastern U.S. It connects to the Haynesville region through several interconnects with other pipelines.
  3. Gulf South Pipeline: This pipeline spans more than 7,000 miles and transports natural gas from production areas in the Gulf Coast region to markets in the southeastern U.S.

As for the LNG export terminals, there are several located near the Haynesville region, including:

  1. Sabine Pass LNG Terminal: This terminal is located in Cameron Parish, Louisiana, and is currently the largest LNG export facility in the United States. It has a capacity of approximately 4.5 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) and is owned and operated by Cheniere Energy.
  2. Cameron LNG Terminal: This terminal is also located in Cameron Parish, Louisiana, and has a capacity of approximately 1.7 Bcf/d. It is owned by a consortium of companies, including Sempra Energy, Mitsui & Co., Total, and JERA.
  3. Freeport LNG Terminal: This terminal is located on Quintana Island, Texas, and has a capacity of approximately 2.2 Bcf/d. It is owned and operated by Freeport LNG Development, L.P.

The Haynesville shale play is one of the largest natural gas-producing basins in the United States, and it covers a significant portion of Louisiana, Texas, and Arkansas. 

The Haynesville shale play contains an estimated 304 trillion cubic feet of technically recoverable natural gas reserves, making it one of the largest natural gas plays in the United States.

According to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), natural gas production from the Haynesville shale reached a record high of 12.8 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) in December 2021, accounting for approximately 9% of total US natural gas production.

There are numerous companies operating in the Haynesville shale play, including some of the largest natural gas producers in the United States such as Chesapeake Energy, Comstock Resources, and Range Resources.

Economic impact: The development of the Haynesville shale play has brought significant economic benefits to the region, including job creation, increased tax revenue, and new business opportunities.

According to a study by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, the development of the Haynesville shale play has created an estimated 57,000 jobs in Louisiana alone since 2008. These jobs include positions in drilling and production, as well as support services such as trucking, equipment rental, and well services.

According to the same study, the development of the Haynesville shale play has generated an estimated $9.6 billion in tax revenue for Louisiana since 2008. This revenue includes severance taxes, sales taxes, and income taxes paid by workers in the O&G industry.

The development of the Haynesville shale play has created new business opportunities in a range of industries. For example, companies that provide water treatment services, pipeline construction and maintenance, and environmental consulting have all seen increased demand as a result of the development of the Haynesville shale play.

It has also attracted significant investment from O&G companies and other investors. According to data from the Louisiana Oil and Gas Association, the Haynesville shale play has attracted more than $75 billion in investment since 2008.

 

In addition to its significant natural gas reserves, the Haynesville basin has also contributed to the development of advanced drilling and completion technologies, which have helped to make shale gas production more efficient and cost-effective. 

The Haynesville Basin is unique and distinct from other shale formations for a few reasons:

The Haynesville shale formation is located at a depth of over 10,000 feet, which is deeper than most other shale plays in the United States. This depth requires specific drilling and production techniques to extract natural gas from the formation.

It is also one of the thickest shale plays in the United States, with thicknesses ranging from 200 to 600 feet. This thickness allows for greater volumes of natural gas to be extracted from the formation.

The natural gas produced from the Haynesville shale is known for its high quality, with low levels of impurities such as sulfur and carbon dioxide. This high-quality natural gas is in high demand by industrial and commercial customers, as well as for use in power generation.

According to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), natural gas production from the Haynesville shale formation increased rapidly from 2010 to 2012, reaching a peak of 10.5 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) in December 2012. This growth was driven by a significant increase in the number of active drilling rigs and improvements in drilling and completion techniques.

However, production from the Haynesville shale formation declined in the following years due to a combination of low natural gas prices, high production costs, and competition from other shale plays. From 2013 to 2017, production from the Haynesville shale declined from a peak of 10.5 Bcf/d to a low of 6.4 Bcf/d.

In recent years, the development of new technologies and improved drilling and completion techniques have led to a resurgence in production from the Haynesville shale formation. According to the EIA, natural gas production from the Haynesville shale reached a new record high of 12.8 Bcf/d in December 2021, driven by an increase in drilling activity and continued improvements in technology and efficiency.

The first drillings and the firts production in the Haynesville basin

Exploration and drilling activities in the Haynesville shale began in the early 2000s, but it was not until 2008 that the first commercial production of natural gas was achieved. That year, Chesapeake Energy Corporation announced a significant natural gas discovery in the Haynesville formation in northwest Louisiana, which quickly led to a surge in drilling activity in the region.

In the years that followed, advances in drilling and completion technologies, such as hydraulic fracturing (fracking) and horizontal drilling, helped to unlock the vast reserves of natural gas in the Haynesville shale, leading to a boom in production. The peak production of natural gas in the Haynesville basin was reached in 2012, and since then, production has stabilized at a high level.

Today, the Haynesville basin remains a major source of natural gas in the United States, accounting for about 10% of the country's total natural gas production. The basin also continues to attract investment from major energy companies and has become an important contributor to the economy of the region.

The first and best-known industry players in the Haynesville basin

The Haynesville shale play in northwest Louisiana and eastern Texas has attracted a large number of industry players since its discovery, but there were a few companies that were among the first to recognize the potential of the play and make significant investments in its development.

One of the first companies to recognize the potential of the Haynesville shale was Chesapeake Energy Corporation. In 2008, Chesapeake announced a significant natural gas discovery in the Haynesville formation in northwest Louisiana, which helped to spark a surge in drilling activity in the region. Chesapeake Energy Corporation was one of the early pioneers in the development of the Haynesville shale and played a significant role in the growth of natural gas production in the region. However, the company faced significant financial challenges in the years following the shale boom, including mounting debt and declining natural gas prices, which led to bankruptcy in 2020. Today, Chesapeake Energy is a major player in the region.

Another early player in the Haynesville basin was Petrohawk Energy Corporation. In 2006, Petrohawk acquired significant acreage in the Haynesville shale and was one of the first companies to drill and complete successful wells in the play. The company was known for its aggressive drilling program and innovative use of technology to extract natural gas from shale rock. In 2011, Petrohawk was acquired by BHP Billiton, a global resources company, for $12.1 billion. Today, while Petrohawk Energy Corporation no longer exists as an independent entity, its legacy continues in the Haynesville shale as part of BHP's portfolio of assets.

Other major industry players that have been active in the Haynesville basin include ExxonMobil, BP, Royal Dutch Shell, and Range Resources, among others. These companies have invested significant resources in the development of the Haynesville shale. Ultimately, the relative leadership of these companies may depend on factors such as their financial strength, technological capabilities, and operational efficiency.

Did the unconventional drilling age change the Haynesville?

The Haynesville shale play was largely developed during the unconventional drilling age, which was characterized by advances in drilling and completion technologies that allowed for the economic extraction of oil and gas from unconventional reservoirs, such as shale formations. 

The advent of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, allowed for the efficient extraction of oil and gas from shale formations. Fracking involves injecting a mixture of water, sand, and chemicals into the well at high pressure, which fractures the shale and allows the oil and gas to flow to the surface.

Horizontal drilling technology allowed for the drilling of longer wells that could access more of the shale formation, increasing the amount of oil and gas that could be extracted from a single well.

Advances in seismic imaging technology allowed for more accurate mapping of the subsurface geology, which helped to identify areas with high concentrations of oil and gas.

As the industry gained more experience with unconventional drilling techniques, it became more efficient at drilling and completing wells, which helped to reduce costs and improve the economics of shale gas development.

With the development of fracking and horizontal drilling, oil, and gas companies are now able to access previously inaccessible shale formations, which contain vast reserves of hydrocarbons. This has led to a significant increase in domestic oil and gas production.

According to data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), U.S. crude oil production increased from 5.5 million barrels per day (b/d) in 2010 to 11.3 million b/d in 2019, largely driven by the development of shale formations using fracking and horizontal drilling. Similarly, natural gas production increased from 21.6 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) in 2010 to 34.9 Tcf in 2019, with the majority of the growth coming from shale gas production using these new technologies.

Together, these changes helped to unlock the vast reserves of natural gas in the Haynesville shale.

The development of the Haynesville shale play presented a number of technological challenges for oil and gas companies, particularly as the play matured and operators moved into more complex areas of the formation. 

As drilling activity in the Haynesville increased, operators faced the challenge of maintaining well productivity as the play became more mature. One challenge was preventing the decline of production rates over time, which required improvements in drilling and completion techniques to optimize well performance.

The cost of drilling and completing wells in the Haynesville was a major challenge for operators, particularly as the price of natural gas fluctuated. Companies sought to reduce well costs through the use of more efficient drilling and completion techniques, as well as through economies of scale.

The average cost of natural gas/oil extracted from the Haynesville and Permian basins can vary depending on a number of factors such as the specific location within each basin, the drilling and completion techniques used, and the price of oil and natural gas at the time of extraction. However, some industry estimates suggest that the average cost of natural gas extracted from the Haynesville shale play in the years 2015-2018 was around $2.50 to $3.50 per million British thermal units (MMBtu). In comparison, the average cost of natural gas extracted from the Permian basin during the same period was estimated to be around $1.50 to $2.50 per MMBtu.

The development of the Haynesville shale play raised concerns about the potential environmental impact of drilling and fracking operations. Companies worked to mitigate these impacts through improved well design and construction, better management of drilling fluids and produced water and more responsible disposal of waste materials.

As drilling activity increased in the Haynesville, safety became an important issue for operators. Companies worked to improve safety through the use of better equipment and technology, more rigorous safety training and protocols, and closer collaboration with regulatory agencies and other stakeholders.

As the Haynesville shale play became more mature, companies faced the challenge of maximizing resource recovery while minimizing costs. This required the use of advanced reservoir management techniques, such as reservoir modeling and enhanced oil recovery methods, to optimize production and recovery rates.

How did the biggest drops in production happen and why? How did the industry survive?

The Haynesville shale play, like many other shale plays, has experienced fluctuations in production over the years due to a variety of factors, including changes in natural gas prices, drilling activity levels, and technological advancements. 

In 2012 and 2013, natural gas prices dropped sharply, which led to a decline in drilling activity in the Haynesville and a corresponding drop in production. The industry responded by reducing costs through layoffs, lower drilling rates, and more efficient drilling and completion techniques. Some companies also diversified their portfolios by investing in oil and other liquids-rich plays. However, some industry estimates suggest that companies were able to reduce their drilling and completion costs in the Haynesville shale play by up to 30-40% through the use of more efficient techniques and economies of scale.

In 2015, natural gas prices once again dropped, leading to a decline in drilling activity in the Haynesville and a corresponding drop in production. The industry responded by further reducing costs, improving drilling and completion efficiency, and investing in technologies such as data analytics and automation to improve productivity and reduce costs.

In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic led to a sharp drop in demand for natural gas, which caused prices to plummet and led to a decline in drilling activity in the Haynesville and other shale plays. The industry responded by reducing drilling activity and focusing on the most productive wells in order to maintain profitability.

In addition, many companies have diversified their portfolios by investing in oil and other liquids-rich plays, which can help to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in natural gas prices.

Has the Haynesville basin faced any environmental challenges?

The development of the Haynesville shale play has raised a number of environmental challenges, including:

Hydraulic fracturing requires large amounts of water, which can put a strain on local water resources. In addition, there have been concerns about the potential for fracking fluids and produced water to contaminate groundwater and surface water sources.

The drilling and completion of wells can release air pollutants such as volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), which can contribute to smog and other air quality problems.

TT The Haynesville shale and Permian Basin both face similar challenges when it comes to the release of methane, which is a potent greenhouse gas that contributes to climate change. However, there are some differences between the two shale plays in terms of their specific challenges related to methane emissions.

One challenge for the Haynesville shale is that the geology of the formation can make it more difficult to extract natural gas without releasing methane. The shale has a high clay content, which can trap methane in the rock and make it more likely to escape during drilling and extraction. Additionally, the high pressure and temperature conditions in the Haynesville can make it more difficult to contain methane emissions.

In contrast, the Permian Basin has a higher concentration of oil and natural gas liquids compared to the Haynesville, which means that companies in the Permian may focus more on oil production rather than natural gas. This can lead to a lower overall level of methane emissions, but there are still concerns about leakage and venting during drilling and extraction activities.

Both shale plays face similar challenges when it comes to monitoring and reducing methane emissions. However, companies in the Haynesville and Permian are implementing various technologies and practices to address these issues, including the use of leak detection and repair programs, improved well design, and the implementation of best management practices.

There have been concerns about the potential for fracking operations to induce earthquakes, particularly in areas where there are faults or other geological features that can be activated by fluid injection.

To address these challenges, the industry and regulatory agencies have implemented a range of measures, such as better management of produced water and drilling fluids, tighter regulations on air emissions, and improved well construction and design to reduce the risk of groundwater contamination. However, environmental concerns continue to be a topic of debate and concern among stakeholders in the Haynesville and other shale plays.

What mergers and acquisitions have occurred?

The Haynesville shale play has seen a number of mergers and acquisitions over the years as companies have sought to expand their positions in the play and take advantage of its potential.

In 2014, Chesapeake Energy acquired Vine Oil and Gas, a major player in the Haynesville shale, for $1.26 billion. The acquisition added over 400,000 net acres to Chesapeake's position in the Haynesville and made it one of the largest operators in the play.

In 2018, EXCO Resources acquired BHP Billiton's Haynesville shale assets for $300 million. The acquisition included over 100,000 net acres in the play and made EXCO one of the largest operators in the area.

In 2019, Comstock Resources acquired Covey Park Energy, a major player in the Haynesville, for $2.2 billion. The acquisition added over 600,000 net acres to Comstock's position in the play and made it one of the largest operators in the area.

In 2021, Southwestern Energy acquired Indigo Natural Resources, a private company with significant operations in the Haynesville, for $2.7 billion. The acquisition added over 375,000 net acres to Southwestern's position in the play and made it the largest producer in the area.

These are just a few examples of the mergers and acquisitions that have taken place in the Haynesville shale play over the years. The consolidation of acreage and assets by larger companies has helped to drive efficiency and reduce costs in the play, while also contributing to the overall growth and development of the area.

The oil and gas industry is constantly seeking new technologies to improve efficiency and productivity in the Haynesville shale play. Companies are using advanced drilling techniques such as horizontal drilling and multi-stage hydraulic fracturing to access more of the reservoir and maximize production. In addition, new completion techniques such as "plug and perf" and "slickwater" fracturing are being used to optimize well performance.

Companies are using artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms to analyze data from drilling and completion operations, identify trends and patterns, and make more informed decisions about how to optimize production and reduce costs.

The use of digital technologies such as sensors, automation, and robotics is becoming more widespread in the industry, allowing companies to monitor and control drilling and production operations in real-time, improve safety and efficiency, and reduce costs.

Companies are using advanced data analytics and visualization tools to better understand reservoir characteristics and production performance, optimize well spacing and completion designs, and identify opportunities for further cost reductions and efficiency gains.

The industry is increasingly focused on reducing emissions from drilling and production operations and is exploring a range of low-emission technologies such as electrification, hydrogen fuel cells, and carbon capture and storage (CCS) to achieve this goal.

These are just a few examples of the technologies being implemented by companies in the Haynesville shale play to achieve maximum efficiency and productivity. As technology continues to evolve, it is likely that new and even more innovative solutions will emerge in the years to come.

Also, it is located in close proximity to major demand centers in the Gulf Coast region, including the growing liquefied natural gas (LNG) export market. This makes it a valuable source of supply for both domestic and

If you are looking for more information about energy companies, their assets, and energy deals, please, contact our sales office mapping@hartenergy.com, Tel. 619-349-4970 or SCHEDULE A DEMO to learn how Rextag can help you leverage energy data for your business.

 

Haynesville's Top 2022 Players That Made It Happen

$data['article']['post_image_alt']

After reaching record-high production in 2021, the Haynesville Shale seemed to have a quiet 2022, with a smattering of deal activity and attention seemingly focused more on LNG exports than production. Meanwhile, the indications are that the third-largest producing gas shale in the U.S. is growing up for a robust 2023 if commodity prices stand still. Top basin performers Chesapeake Energy, Southwestern Energy, Comstock Resources, Aethon Energy, and Rockcliff Energy II produced a combined total of 1.53 MMboe/d, 83 bbl/d of oil, and 9.2 Bcf/d of gas in the first half of 2022.

WhiteHawk Energy Expands Portfolio with $54 Million Marcellus Shale Natural Gas Asset Purchase

$data['article']['post_image_alt']

WhiteHawk Energy has recently completed a significant acquisition in the Marcellus Shale, investing $54 million. This deal has effectively doubled their mineral and royalty ownership in the Marcellus Shale, particularly in Greene and Washington counties in Pennsylvania. This region is noted for its high-quality natural gas reserves. WhiteHawk’s Marcellus assets now encompass approximately 475,000 gross unit acres, featuring production from about 1,315 horizontal shale wells. In addition to this, they own interests in 72 wells-in-progress, 64 permitted wells, and nearly 900 undeveloped Marcellus locations. This acquisition is expected to double WhiteHawk's net revenue interest in each well within its Marcellus holdings​​.

$data['article']['post_image_alt']

The total number of drilling rigs actively exploring and producing oil and natural gas in the United States increased to 585 for the week ending July 5, up from 581 the previous week. Despite this recent uptick, the current count still falls short of last year's 680, indicating a slowdown in drilling activities. Analysts suggest that this reduction may reflect greater efficiency among shale producers, who now require fewer rigs. Nonetheless, concerns remain about whether some producers have enough viable drilling land

$data['article']['post_image_alt']

Based in Oklahoma City, Devon Energy is expanding its operations in the Williston Basin with a major $5 billion acquisition of Grayson Mill Energy, a company supported by the Houston-based EnCap Investments LP. This deal includes $3.25 billion in cash and $1.75 billion in Devon stock. Announced before the markets opened on July 8, this strategic move aims to boost Devon's oil production and operational scale significantly

$data['article']['post_image_alt']

Renewable diesel, a cousin to traditional petroleum diesel, stands out as a standalone fuel and a blendable option. In 2022, it accounted for about 8% of all U.S. biofuel production and 9% of its consumption. For decades, diesel has been the stalwart choice for both shippers and carriers, valued for its reliability. Yet, as sustainability becomes a priority, these industries are now navigating the complex world of alternative fuels. This shift has its challenges; the array of choices comes with varying information about availability, cost, performance, and environmental impact. Amidst these options, renewable diesel is gaining traction.

2022 oil production 2023 2024 3D Earth Science Analytics 3D Modeling Continental Resources 3D modeling 3D modeling CGG 3D modeling ESA 3D visualization 3D visualization CGG A&D A&D deals A&D sector A&Ds in the Gulf of Mexico AAII ANR Pipelines Abraxas Petroleum Acquisition Acquisitions Admiral Permian Resources Advance Energy Advance Energy Partners Holdings LLC Aera Energy Aethon Energy Africa Alaska Pipeline System Alberta Alberta pipeline Algeria Align Midstream LLC Alliance Pipeline AltaGas Altamont Energy Alternative Fuels Ameredev II Anadarko Anadarko Basin Analysis Analytics And Rockcliff Energy Andrews Antero Midstream Antero Midstream Corp. Antero Resources Antitrust Apache Corporation Appalachia Appalachia to Market and Middlesex Extension project Appalachian Appalachian Basin Appalachian basin Aramco ArcLight Capital Partners ArcLight Capital Partners LLC Archaea Energy Inc. Arena Energy LLC Argentina Arrow Midstream Artesia Natural Gas Gathering and Processing System Ascent Resources Asia Asset Holdings Assets Acquisition Assets Revenue Assets Sale Assets Value Athabasca Oil Atlantic Coast Pipeline Australia Autry Stephens Aux Sable Aux Sable Canada Aviation emissions BASF BG Group BHP Billiton BOED BP BP Plc BPX Energy Baker Hughes Bakken Bakken Formation Bakken Shale Bakken shale Bankruptcy Barnett Barnett Shale Bay du Nord Baytex Baytex Energy Berkshire Hathaway Big Horn Biodiesel Bison Midstream Black Bear Transmission Blackstone Energy Partners Blackstone Inc. Blockchain Bloomberg Brazil Brazos Valley Brent BridgeTex Broom Creek Formation Buyout Firms CBAM CCS CDM Resource CGG CNOOC CNOOC International CO2 CO2 reduction COG Operating CVX Cactus II Pipeline Calgary Callon Callon Petroleum Canada Carbon Capture Carbon Footprints Carbon capture and storage Cardinal Midstream Partners Careers in O&G Caribbean map Carl Icahn Carnelian Energy Castleton Commodities Cenovus Cenovus Energy Centennial Resource Centennial Resource Development Centennial Resource Development Inc. Charlson Gathering System Cheniere Energy Cheniere Marketing Chesapeake Chesapeake Energy Chesapeake Energy Corp. Chesapeake Energy Corporation Chevron Chevron Corp. China China Gas Holding LTD. Chord Chord Energy Christmas Cibolo Energy Partners Cimarex Energy Civitas Civitas Resources Clay basin Clean Energy Clearwater Climate Change Coal Codell Colgate Energy Colgate Energy Partners Colgate Energy Partners II LLC Colgate Energy Partners III Colonial Enterprises Colonial Pipeline Colorado Columbia Columbia Gas pipeline Columbia Gulf pipeline Comisión Federal de Electricidad Comprehensive Analysis Comstock Resources Concho Valley Solar Congo ConocoPhillips ConocoPhillips Co. Consolidated Edison Contango Resources Continental Continental Resources Continental Resources Inc. Corpus Christi Costa Azul Coterra Energy Coterra Energy Inc. Cove Point Cove Point LNG Cox Operating LLC Credit Suisse Group Crescent Crescent Energy Crescent Point Crescent Point Energy Crescent Point Energy Corp. Crestwood Crestwood Equity Crestwood Equity Partners Crestwood Equity Partners LP Crestwood Midstream Crestwood Permian Basin Holdings LLC Crowheart Energy CrownQuest CrownRock Crude Oil Crude Prices Crude oil D-J Basin DCP DCP Midstream DJ Basin DOJ DUCs on the Rise Dakota Access Pipeline Dallas Data Dawson Debt Restructuration Decarbonization Technology Decarbonized Fuel Delaware Delaware Basin Delaware basin DelawareBasin Denbury Denmark Denver Denver Julesburg Denver-Julesberg Basin Denver-Julesburg Basin Devon Devon Energy Diamondback Diamondback Energy Diamondback Energy Inc. Dimsdale Gas Dividends Dominion Energy Dominion Energy Questar Pipeline Double E Pipeline DoublePoint Energy DowJones Downstream Market Driftwood Energy Operating LLC Driftwood Pipeline LLC Drilling Drilling Inventory Durango Durham Creek Durham Creek Exploration Duvernay Duvernay shale E&P EDF EIA EIEC EIG ENB EOG EOG Resources EP Energy EPA EQT ESG ESG performance ESG score ESGcriteria ESGinvestment ESGstandarts Eagle Ford Eagle Ford M&As Eagle Ford Shale Earth Science Analytics Earthstone Earthstone Energy Earthstone Energy Inc. East Coast East Texas Eastern Energy Gas Ector Eddy County Egypt El Paso Natural Gas Pipeline Elba Liquefaction Emerson Emerson Electric Emission Emissions EnCap EnCap Flatrock EnCap Flatrock Midstream EnCap Investments EnLink Midstream EnVen Energy EnVen Energy Corp. Enable Midstream Enbridge Enbridge Energy Enbridge Inc Enbridge Pipeline Encap Flatrock Midstream Endeavor Endeavor Energy Endeavor Energy Resources Endeavor Gathering Energy Energy Assets Energy Crisis Energy Gas Energy Information Administration Energy Infrastructure Energy Leaders Energy M&A deals 2022 Energy M&As Energy Prices Energy Production Energy Projects Energy Resources Energy Security Energy Transfer Energy Transfer Canada Energy Transfer LP Energy Transport Solutions Energy security Enerplus Ensign Natural Resources Enterprise Enterprise Product Operating LLC Enterprise Products Enterprise Products Partners Environmental Protection Agency Epic Crude Pipeline Equinor Equinor Energy Ireland Equitrans Equitrans Midstream Equitrans Midstream Corp. Equity Investments Ethanol Conversion Europe Evolution Petroleum Exaro Energy III Exok Exploration Export Expro Exxon Exxon Mobil Exxon Mobil Corp. ExxonMobil FTC Fayetteville Shale Federal Trade Commission Financial Times FireBird Energy FireBird Energy LLC Florida Gas Transmission Flowing Gas Forecast Forgan Forge Energy Fort McMurray FortunaResources Franklin Howard G&P GHG GIP GIS GIS NG data GIS U.S. GIS U.S. NG Data GIS U.S. NG data GIS U.S. data Galapagos Gas Gas Extraction Gas Flaring Gas Holdings Gas Processing Plants Gas Production Gas Rates Gas processing Gathering Gathering and Processing Gathering and Transportation Network Gemini Carthage Genesis Energy Genovesa Germany Glencore Glenn Wright Global Emissions Global Infrastructure Partners Goldman Sachs Goodrich Grand Prix NGL Pipeline Gray Oak Pipeline Gray Oak pipeline Grayson Mill Grayson Mill Energy Great River Hydro LLC Great Western Petroleum Greater Green River Green Canyon Green River Basin Greenhouse Gas Emissions Grupo Carso Guangzhou Gas Gulf Coast Gulf Coast Express Gulf Coast Pipeline System Gulf Mexico map Gulf Oil Corporation Gulf Run Pipeline map Gulf map Gulf of Mexico Gulf of Mexico US map Gulf of Mexico depth map Gulf of Mexico map Gulf of Mexico oil rig map 2023 Gulf of Mexico on map Guyana Halliburton Company Hammerhead Hammerhead Energy Harbour Energy Hart Energy HartEnergy Harvest Midstream Haynesville Haynesville Basin Haynesville Shale Heavy crude Henry Energy Henry Resources Hess Hess Corporation Hess Midstream Hibernia Energy Hilcorp Hilcorp Energy Horizontal Well Houston Humble Midstream Hydraulically Stimulated Resources Hydro-Québec Hydrocarbon Exploration Hydrocarbon Reservoirs Hydrogen IEA IKAV IMEO INEOS INEOS Energy IPO Import Inc. India Indonesia Inergy Inergy Midstream Infrastructure Inter Pipeline International Energy Agency Iran Iron Mountain Ironwood Midstream J.P. Morgan JUSTCapital Japan Joint Venture Jonah Field Jordan Cove KAPS KKR KKR&Co. KMI Karnes Trough Kaybob Duvernay Kazakhstan Key Access Pipeline System Key statistics Keyera Corp Keystone XL Pipeline Kimbell Kimbell Royalty Kimbell Royalty Partners Kinder Morgan Kinder Morgan Inc. Kinetik Kingston Midstream Alberta Kirkuk oil Komipo America Kosmos Energy LEG project LM Energy LNG LNG Delivery LNG Demand LNG Terminals LNG delivery LNG exports LNG plant LNG provider LNG-by-rail LP LaBarge Labrador Lake Charles Lake Charles Project Laredo Petroleum Lario Permian Lario Permian LLC Lea County Leasehold Properties Lemont LetterOne Leucrotta Exploration Libya Lime Rock Lime Rock New Energy Lime Rock Partners Lime Rock Resources Line 3 Pipeline Line 3 project Liquefaction Plant Liquefied Natural Gas Liquefied natural gas Liquids and Natural Gas Pipelines Lloyds Banking Lone Star Express Pipeline LongHorn Lotus Midstream Louisiana Louisiana Energy Gateway Lucid Energy Group Lycos Energy M&A M&As MLP MLPs MMP MPLX MPLX LP MVP Magellan Magellan Midstream Magellan Midstream Partners Mainline Pipeline System Mancos Shale Maple Energy Marathon Marathon Oil Marathon Oil Corp. Marathon Oil Corporation Marathon Petroleum Marcellus Marcellus Basin Marcellus Shale Marcellus region Mariner East Project Mariner east expansion Market Acquisition Of Vine Energy Inc. Market Analysis Marten Hills Pipeline Martin Martin County Maryland Mascot Project Matador Matador Resources Matador Resources Co Matagorda Medallion Midstream Services Medallion Pipeline Merge Merger Merit SI Meritage Midstream Mesa Minerals Partners Mesquite Energy Methane Methane Emissions Methane emissions Methane gas Mewbourne Oil Co. Mexico Mexico Pacific MiQ Mica Midcoast Energy LLC Midcontinent Middle East Midland Midland Basin Midland-Petro D.C. Partners LLC MidlandBasin Midstream Midstream M&As Midstream NG gathering pipelines Midwest Mississippi Mobil Oil Momentum Midstream LLC Monopoly Mont Belvieu Montana Montney Montney Shale Moriah Henry Motiva Enterprises Mountain Valley Mountain Valley Pipeline MountainWest Pipeline Mountrail Gathering System Murphy Murphy Oil NEP NG Pipeline Maps NG U.S. midstream data NG data NG data U.S. NG gathering pipeline systems NG pipeline maps NG3 NGL NGL Energy Partners NGL export NGL logistics NGL pipelines NGL production NGLs NGO NGP NLG NOG NRGreen NTX pipeline NZE National Instruments Natural Gas Natural Gas Assets Natural Gas Certification Natural Gas Equivalent Natural Gas Gathering Natural Gas Infrastructure Natural Gas Liquids Infrastructure Natural Gas Prices Natural Gas Production Natural Gas Products Natural gas pipelines Natural gas production Navitas Midstream Net Acres Net-zero Production New Fortress New Jersey New Mexico New Year Newco Newfoundland NextEra NextEra Energy NextEra Energy Partners Niobrara Niobrara Shale Noble Energy Noble Midstream Partners LP Non-Operated Assets North America North Dakota North Texas Barnett North-East Northern Delaware Basin Northern Natural Gas Northern Oil and Gas Northern Oil and Gas Inc. Northwoods Norway NuStar NuStar Energy Nuevo Midstream O&G O&G Production O&G output records O&G production O&G production forecasting OKE OMOG ONEOK ONEOK Bakken OPEC OPEC+ OXY Oasis Midstream Oasis Midstream Partners Oasis Petroleum Oasis Petroleum Inc. Occidental Occidental Petroleum Offshore Ohio Oil Oil & Gas Oil Equivalent Oil Prices Oil Sanctions Oil and Gas Oil and Gas Production Oil and Gas Properties Oil and Gas production Oil and Gas rigs Oil and gas production Oil companies Oil&Gas Oklahoma Omega Acquisition Inc. OneRock OneRock Energy Onshore Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Operated Wells Orphan Basin Oryx Outrigger DJ Outrigger DJ midstream Ovintiv Oxy Oxy Low Carbon OxyChem PAM PBA PCC PDC Energy PDCE PHMSA PPG PRT Offshore Pacific Pad Activity Monitor Paradigm Paradigm Midstream Paradox Basin Paramount Resources Ltd. Parsley Energy Pearl Energy Investments Peavine Pecos Pecos Oil & Gas Pecos Oil & Gas LLC Pecos River processing plant Pembina Pembina Pipeline Pembina Pipeline Corp. Penn Virginia PennEast Pipeline PennEnergy Resources LLC PennTex Midstream Pennsylvania Percussion Petroleum Permian Permian Basin Permian Basin 2022 Permian Deep Rock Oil Co. Permian Producers Permian Resource Corp. Permian Resources Permian Resources Corp. Permian acreage sale Permian basin PermianBasin PermianResources Petro-Hunt Petrochemical Commercial Company Petrochemical production Petroleum Petroleum Production Petroleum Reserve Peyto Peyto Exploration Phillips 66 Piceance Piceance Basin Pickering Energy PickeringEnergy Pine Wave Energy Partners Pinnacle Midstream Pioneer Pioneer Natural Pioneer Natural Resources Pipeline Pipeline Maps Pipeline Performance Group Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipelines Pipelines and Refineries Pipestone Condensate Pipestone Phase Placid Montney Plains Plains All American Plains Pipeline Plato Point Pleasant Pony Express Pipeline Powder River Powder River Basin Powder River basin Power Generation Power Plant Fuel Power River basin Prairie Operating Processing plants Production Production Forecast Propane PureWest Quantum Capital Quantum Energy Partners Quantum Technology QuarterNorth QuarterNorth Energy Questar Pipeline RBC Capital RNG RSG Rangeland Energy Rangeland Midstream Canada Ranger Oil Rattler Midstream Reagan county Red Trail Energy RedBird Capital Partners Reduction of Greenhouse Emissions Reeves Reeves County Regional Energy Access Renewable Renewable Diesel Renewable Energy Group Renewable Natural Gas Renewables Repsol Repsol Canada Research Responsibly Sourced Gas Reuters Rextag Ridgemar Energy Riley Exploration Riley Exploration Permian Inc. RimRock Ring Energy Ring Energy Inc. RiverBasin Riverstone Rockcliff Rockcliff Energy Rockies Rockies Express Pipeline Rocky Mountain Rocky Mountains Rocky mountain Rover pipeline Rudolf Rudolf Red Nose Russia Rystad Energy SAF SEC SHLX SM Energy SPA STX Midstream Sabine Pass LNG LP Safety Administration Saguaro Energía San Andres formation San Juan Basin San Mateo Sanchez Energy SandRidge Santa Santa Clause Santander Saskatchewan Saudi Arabia Saudi Aramco Schlumberger Limited Schneider Digital Scope 1 Scope 2 Sedimentary Basin Select Water Solutions SemGroup Sempra Energy Senate Sendero Midstream Sequestration Shale Shale Field Shale Formation Shale Gas Shale Industry Shale Oil Producer Shareholder Returns Shares Shawcor Shell Shell Midstream Partners Shell New Energies Shell Oil Company Shell PLC Shell Plc. Shell UAS Sierra Grande Silver Hill Energy Partners III SilverBow SilverBow Resources Sinochem Group Skye MS Sour crude South Carlsbad Natural Gas Gathering System South Haynesville Basin South Texas Southcross Energy Southeast Gateway Southeast Supply Enhancement Project Southern Access expansion Southern Lights Pipeline Southern Union Southwest Gas Southwest Gas Holdings Southwestern Energy Southwestern Energy Company Spain Spraberry Formation Sprng Energy Stagecoach Gas Standard Oil of New Jersey Standing Rock Indian Reservation Steel Reef Infrastructure Corp. Sterling DJ Sterling DJ system Stock Market Stonepeak Partners LP Stonepeak Partners. Storage Strategic Petroleum Reserve Strategic Resources Stronghold Energy Sumitomo Summit Midstream Summit Midstream Holdings Summit Midstream Partners Summit Midstream Partners LP Summit’s Lane System Sunoco Sunrise Oil Sands TAPS TC Energy TC Energy Corp. TC PipeLines LP TG East Texas Resources TG Natural Resources TGNR THQ Appalachia TRP Tailwater Capital Takeaway Tallgrass Energy Talos Talos Energy Talos Energy Inc. TalosEnergy Tap Rock Resources Targa Resources Targa Resources Corp. Tenaris Tesoro High Plains Pipeline Tesoro Logistics Texas Texas Eastern Pipeline Texas Gas Transmission Texas Oil Texas Panhandle Texon Oil and Land Company The Appalachian Basin The Denver-Julesburg Basin The Permian Basin The United States Tidewater Midstream Titus Oil & Gas Production LLC Tivoli Tivoli Midstream Tivoli Services Tokyo Gas Tokyo Gas America Tokyo Gas Co. Ltd. TokyoGas TotalEnergies Trace Midstream Trans Mountain pipeline TransCanada Transco Transcontinental pipeline Transport Permit Transportation Infrastructure Trends Tres Palacios Tri-State Water Truist Securities Tug Hill Tug Hill Operating U.S. U.S. Gulf Coast U.S. LNG exports U.S. NG data U.S. NG midstream data U.S. NG upstream U.S. NG upstream data U.S. crude exports U.S. crude oil data U.S. energy U.S. energy M&A U.S. energy data U.S. energy industry U.S. energy maps U.S. hydrogen production U.S. midstream data U.S. refineries U.S. shale gas assets U.S. upstream data UAE UK UPC US US NG US gas US oil USA USA Compression Partners USgas USoil Uinta Uinta Basin Uintah Basin Ukraine Unit Corporation Unit Petroleum Company United States Upstream Upstream M&As Upstream companies Upton county Utah Utica Basin Utica Shale Utilization Van Hook Gathering System Vencer Energy Venezuela Vermilion Energy Vermont Business Magazine HQI US Holding LLC Viking Viper Energy Viper Energy Partners Vista Pacifico Vital Energy Vital Energy Inc. Vitol WCS WPX Energy WTI Waha Hub Wamsutter Field War Warburg Pincus Ward Warren Buffett Water Management Water management Wattenberg Webinar Webster Pipeline Well maps Wells West Texas Western Canada Select Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin Western Midstream Western Midstream Partners White House WhiteHawk WhiteHawk Energy Whiting Whiting Petroleum Wholesale WildFire Energy I LLC William Companies Williams Williams Companies Williston Williston Basin Willston basin Wind River Wintershall Dea Wolfcamp Formation Wood River Woodford Woodford Express Woodland Midstream II Wyatt Resources Wyoming XCL Resources XTO Energy XcL Midstream Zacks Consensus Zephyr Energy Zhejiang Energy Acquisition Acquisitions Acreage Acreage maps Acreage sale Acreage sales Acreage valuation Acres Analytics And Phillips 66 Partners And Rockcliff Energy Asset renewal Asset sale Assets Assets merger Atural gas gathering Aviation Aviation fuel Barrel Barrels Bbl Biodiesel Bioenergy Bioethanol Biofuels Boe Carbon capture and storage Carbon capture storage (CCS) Carbon emissions Carbon footprint Carbon-free Cash Coating Crude Crude export terminals Crude exports to Europe Crude oil Crude oil and natural gas output Crude oil delivery Crude oil production Crude oil refineries Deal Decarbonization Divestitures Divestment Drilling activity Drilling permits Drilling rigs Dry gas Ecology Efficiency Electrification Electrofuels Emission reduction Emissions Emissions reduction Energy Energy M&A Energy acquisitions Energy deals Energy infrastructure Energy maps Energy market Energy provider Energy services Energy supplies Energy transfer Environment Expansion Exploration Exploration & production Financial results Flaring gas Forecast Fuel Fuel transportation Gas Gas prices Gas projects Gas rig Gasoline Gathering systems Geologic CO2 storage Geothermal power Global energy system Green energy Greenhouse gas Greenhouse-gas emissions Growth Horizontal drilling Hydraulic fracturing (fracking) technology Hydrogen pipeline maps Industry Interactive maps of oil rigs in the Gulf of Mexico Investment Joint ventures Laws Liquefied natural gas Liquified natural gas Low emissions Low-carbon fuel Management Map of Caribbean Map of pipelines Master limited partnership Merger Merger and acquisition Mergers Midstream Midstream footprint Midstream infrastructure Mineral Natural gas Natural gas gathering and processing Natural gas maps Natural gas pipelines Natural gas producer Natural gas production News Offshore Offshore oil and gas Oil Oil & gas Oil and energy Oil and natural gas assets Oil demand Oil market Oil output Oil prices Oil producers Oil rigs Oil supply Onshore Partnership Petroleum Petroleum infrastructure Pipeline Pipeline maps Pipelines Power Processing plants Produced water Production Rating Rebranding Refinery Renewable energy Renewable energy sources Renewable natural gas Renewables Report Rigs Sanctions Shale Simulation Smart contract Smart contracts Software Solar energy Standards Stock Storage Subsurface CO2 sequestration Subsurface characterization Surface Sustainability The Gulf map The James Lake System The Permian Basin Transaction Transactions Undrilled locations Upstream Upstream production Water management Well Well maps Well redevelopment Wells Wet gas Wind energy