Comprehensive Energy Data Intelligence
Information About Energy Companies, Their Assets, Market Deals, Industry Documents and More...
The Haynesville oil and gas basin and its importance
03/30/2023
The Haynesville oil and gas basin is a significant shale gas-producing region located primarily in northwest Louisiana and eastern Texas in the United Statesб with some estimates suggesting it could contain up to 500 trillion cubic feet of recoverable natural gas.
The Haynesville basin has become a key source of natural gas production in the United States, helping to fuel the country's increasing demand for natural gas as a cleaner alternative to coal and oil. The basin's strategic location near major pipelines and liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminals has also made it an important source of natural gas for international markets.
Some of the key pipelines serving the region include:
- Gulf Crossing Pipeline: This pipeline spans approximately 357 miles and transports natural gas from the Barnett Shale in Texas to markets in the southeastern U.S., including Louisiana.
- Texas Eastern Transmission Pipeline: This pipeline stretches more than 9,000 miles and serves customers in the northeastern and southeastern U.S. It connects to the Haynesville region through several interconnects with other pipelines.
- Gulf South Pipeline: This pipeline spans more than 7,000 miles and transports natural gas from production areas in the Gulf Coast region to markets in the southeastern U.S.
As for the LNG export terminals, there are several located near the Haynesville region, including:
- Sabine Pass LNG Terminal: This terminal is located in Cameron Parish, Louisiana, and is currently the largest LNG export facility in the United States. It has a capacity of approximately 4.5 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) and is owned and operated by Cheniere Energy.
- Cameron LNG Terminal: This terminal is also located in Cameron Parish, Louisiana, and has a capacity of approximately 1.7 Bcf/d. It is owned by a consortium of companies, including Sempra Energy, Mitsui & Co., Total, and JERA.
- Freeport LNG Terminal: This terminal is located on Quintana Island, Texas, and has a capacity of approximately 2.2 Bcf/d. It is owned and operated by Freeport LNG Development, L.P.
The Haynesville shale play is one of the largest natural gas-producing basins in the United States, and it covers a significant portion of Louisiana, Texas, and Arkansas.
The Haynesville shale play contains an estimated 304 trillion cubic feet of technically recoverable natural gas reserves, making it one of the largest natural gas plays in the United States.
According to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), natural gas production from the Haynesville shale reached a record high of 12.8 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) in December 2021, accounting for approximately 9% of total US natural gas production.
There are numerous companies operating in the Haynesville shale play, including some of the largest natural gas producers in the United States such as Chesapeake Energy, Comstock Resources, and Range Resources.
Economic impact: The development of the Haynesville shale play has brought significant economic benefits to the region, including job creation, increased tax revenue, and new business opportunities.
According to a study by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, the development of the Haynesville shale play has created an estimated 57,000 jobs in Louisiana alone since 2008. These jobs include positions in drilling and production, as well as support services such as trucking, equipment rental, and well services.
According to the same study, the development of the Haynesville shale play has generated an estimated $9.6 billion in tax revenue for Louisiana since 2008. This revenue includes severance taxes, sales taxes, and income taxes paid by workers in the O&G industry.
The development of the Haynesville shale play has created new business opportunities in a range of industries. For example, companies that provide water treatment services, pipeline construction and maintenance, and environmental consulting have all seen increased demand as a result of the development of the Haynesville shale play.
It has also attracted significant investment from O&G companies and other investors. According to data from the Louisiana Oil and Gas Association, the Haynesville shale play has attracted more than $75 billion in investment since 2008.
In addition to its significant natural gas reserves, the Haynesville basin has also contributed to the development of advanced drilling and completion technologies, which have helped to make shale gas production more efficient and cost-effective.
The Haynesville Basin is unique and distinct from other shale formations for a few reasons:
The Haynesville shale formation is located at a depth of over 10,000 feet, which is deeper than most other shale plays in the United States. This depth requires specific drilling and production techniques to extract natural gas from the formation.
It is also one of the thickest shale plays in the United States, with thicknesses ranging from 200 to 600 feet. This thickness allows for greater volumes of natural gas to be extracted from the formation.
The natural gas produced from the Haynesville shale is known for its high quality, with low levels of impurities such as sulfur and carbon dioxide. This high-quality natural gas is in high demand by industrial and commercial customers, as well as for use in power generation.
According to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), natural gas production from the Haynesville shale formation increased rapidly from 2010 to 2012, reaching a peak of 10.5 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) in December 2012. This growth was driven by a significant increase in the number of active drilling rigs and improvements in drilling and completion techniques.
However, production from the Haynesville shale formation declined in the following years due to a combination of low natural gas prices, high production costs, and competition from other shale plays. From 2013 to 2017, production from the Haynesville shale declined from a peak of 10.5 Bcf/d to a low of 6.4 Bcf/d.
In recent years, the development of new technologies and improved drilling and completion techniques have led to a resurgence in production from the Haynesville shale formation. According to the EIA, natural gas production from the Haynesville shale reached a new record high of 12.8 Bcf/d in December 2021, driven by an increase in drilling activity and continued improvements in technology and efficiency.
The first drillings and the firts production in the Haynesville basin
Exploration and drilling activities in the Haynesville shale began in the early 2000s, but it was not until 2008 that the first commercial production of natural gas was achieved. That year, Chesapeake Energy Corporation announced a significant natural gas discovery in the Haynesville formation in northwest Louisiana, which quickly led to a surge in drilling activity in the region.
In the years that followed, advances in drilling and completion technologies, such as hydraulic fracturing (fracking) and horizontal drilling, helped to unlock the vast reserves of natural gas in the Haynesville shale, leading to a boom in production. The peak production of natural gas in the Haynesville basin was reached in 2012, and since then, production has stabilized at a high level.
Today, the Haynesville basin remains a major source of natural gas in the United States, accounting for about 10% of the country's total natural gas production. The basin also continues to attract investment from major energy companies and has become an important contributor to the economy of the region.
The first and best-known industry players in the Haynesville basin
The Haynesville shale play in northwest Louisiana and eastern Texas has attracted a large number of industry players since its discovery, but there were a few companies that were among the first to recognize the potential of the play and make significant investments in its development.
One of the first companies to recognize the potential of the Haynesville shale was Chesapeake Energy Corporation. In 2008, Chesapeake announced a significant natural gas discovery in the Haynesville formation in northwest Louisiana, which helped to spark a surge in drilling activity in the region. Chesapeake Energy Corporation was one of the early pioneers in the development of the Haynesville shale and played a significant role in the growth of natural gas production in the region. However, the company faced significant financial challenges in the years following the shale boom, including mounting debt and declining natural gas prices, which led to bankruptcy in 2020. Today, Chesapeake Energy is a major player in the region.
Another early player in the Haynesville basin was Petrohawk Energy Corporation. In 2006, Petrohawk acquired significant acreage in the Haynesville shale and was one of the first companies to drill and complete successful wells in the play. The company was known for its aggressive drilling program and innovative use of technology to extract natural gas from shale rock. In 2011, Petrohawk was acquired by BHP Billiton, a global resources company, for $12.1 billion. Today, while Petrohawk Energy Corporation no longer exists as an independent entity, its legacy continues in the Haynesville shale as part of BHP's portfolio of assets.
Other major industry players that have been active in the Haynesville basin include ExxonMobil, BP, Royal Dutch Shell, and Range Resources, among others. These companies have invested significant resources in the development of the Haynesville shale. Ultimately, the relative leadership of these companies may depend on factors such as their financial strength, technological capabilities, and operational efficiency.
Did the unconventional drilling age change the Haynesville?
The Haynesville shale play was largely developed during the unconventional drilling age, which was characterized by advances in drilling and completion technologies that allowed for the economic extraction of oil and gas from unconventional reservoirs, such as shale formations.
The advent of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, allowed for the efficient extraction of oil and gas from shale formations. Fracking involves injecting a mixture of water, sand, and chemicals into the well at high pressure, which fractures the shale and allows the oil and gas to flow to the surface.
Horizontal drilling technology allowed for the drilling of longer wells that could access more of the shale formation, increasing the amount of oil and gas that could be extracted from a single well.
Advances in seismic imaging technology allowed for more accurate mapping of the subsurface geology, which helped to identify areas with high concentrations of oil and gas.
As the industry gained more experience with unconventional drilling techniques, it became more efficient at drilling and completing wells, which helped to reduce costs and improve the economics of shale gas development.
With the development of fracking and horizontal drilling, oil, and gas companies are now able to access previously inaccessible shale formations, which contain vast reserves of hydrocarbons. This has led to a significant increase in domestic oil and gas production.
According to data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), U.S. crude oil production increased from 5.5 million barrels per day (b/d) in 2010 to 11.3 million b/d in 2019, largely driven by the development of shale formations using fracking and horizontal drilling. Similarly, natural gas production increased from 21.6 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) in 2010 to 34.9 Tcf in 2019, with the majority of the growth coming from shale gas production using these new technologies.
Together, these changes helped to unlock the vast reserves of natural gas in the Haynesville shale.
The development of the Haynesville shale play presented a number of technological challenges for oil and gas companies, particularly as the play matured and operators moved into more complex areas of the formation.
As drilling activity in the Haynesville increased, operators faced the challenge of maintaining well productivity as the play became more mature. One challenge was preventing the decline of production rates over time, which required improvements in drilling and completion techniques to optimize well performance.
The cost of drilling and completing wells in the Haynesville was a major challenge for operators, particularly as the price of natural gas fluctuated. Companies sought to reduce well costs through the use of more efficient drilling and completion techniques, as well as through economies of scale.
The average cost of natural gas/oil extracted from the Haynesville and Permian basins can vary depending on a number of factors such as the specific location within each basin, the drilling and completion techniques used, and the price of oil and natural gas at the time of extraction. However, some industry estimates suggest that the average cost of natural gas extracted from the Haynesville shale play in the years 2015-2018 was around $2.50 to $3.50 per million British thermal units (MMBtu). In comparison, the average cost of natural gas extracted from the Permian basin during the same period was estimated to be around $1.50 to $2.50 per MMBtu.
The development of the Haynesville shale play raised concerns about the potential environmental impact of drilling and fracking operations. Companies worked to mitigate these impacts through improved well design and construction, better management of drilling fluids and produced water and more responsible disposal of waste materials.
As drilling activity increased in the Haynesville, safety became an important issue for operators. Companies worked to improve safety through the use of better equipment and technology, more rigorous safety training and protocols, and closer collaboration with regulatory agencies and other stakeholders.
As the Haynesville shale play became more mature, companies faced the challenge of maximizing resource recovery while minimizing costs. This required the use of advanced reservoir management techniques, such as reservoir modeling and enhanced oil recovery methods, to optimize production and recovery rates.
How did the biggest drops in production happen and why? How did the industry survive?
The Haynesville shale play, like many other shale plays, has experienced fluctuations in production over the years due to a variety of factors, including changes in natural gas prices, drilling activity levels, and technological advancements.
In 2012 and 2013, natural gas prices dropped sharply, which led to a decline in drilling activity in the Haynesville and a corresponding drop in production. The industry responded by reducing costs through layoffs, lower drilling rates, and more efficient drilling and completion techniques. Some companies also diversified their portfolios by investing in oil and other liquids-rich plays. However, some industry estimates suggest that companies were able to reduce their drilling and completion costs in the Haynesville shale play by up to 30-40% through the use of more efficient techniques and economies of scale.
In 2015, natural gas prices once again dropped, leading to a decline in drilling activity in the Haynesville and a corresponding drop in production. The industry responded by further reducing costs, improving drilling and completion efficiency, and investing in technologies such as data analytics and automation to improve productivity and reduce costs.
In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic led to a sharp drop in demand for natural gas, which caused prices to plummet and led to a decline in drilling activity in the Haynesville and other shale plays. The industry responded by reducing drilling activity and focusing on the most productive wells in order to maintain profitability.
In addition, many companies have diversified their portfolios by investing in oil and other liquids-rich plays, which can help to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in natural gas prices.
Has the Haynesville basin faced any environmental challenges?
The development of the Haynesville shale play has raised a number of environmental challenges, including:
Hydraulic fracturing requires large amounts of water, which can put a strain on local water resources. In addition, there have been concerns about the potential for fracking fluids and produced water to contaminate groundwater and surface water sources.
The drilling and completion of wells can release air pollutants such as volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), which can contribute to smog and other air quality problems.
TT The Haynesville shale and Permian Basin both face similar challenges when it comes to the release of methane, which is a potent greenhouse gas that contributes to climate change. However, there are some differences between the two shale plays in terms of their specific challenges related to methane emissions.
One challenge for the Haynesville shale is that the geology of the formation can make it more difficult to extract natural gas without releasing methane. The shale has a high clay content, which can trap methane in the rock and make it more likely to escape during drilling and extraction. Additionally, the high pressure and temperature conditions in the Haynesville can make it more difficult to contain methane emissions.
In contrast, the Permian Basin has a higher concentration of oil and natural gas liquids compared to the Haynesville, which means that companies in the Permian may focus more on oil production rather than natural gas. This can lead to a lower overall level of methane emissions, but there are still concerns about leakage and venting during drilling and extraction activities.
Both shale plays face similar challenges when it comes to monitoring and reducing methane emissions. However, companies in the Haynesville and Permian are implementing various technologies and practices to address these issues, including the use of leak detection and repair programs, improved well design, and the implementation of best management practices.
There have been concerns about the potential for fracking operations to induce earthquakes, particularly in areas where there are faults or other geological features that can be activated by fluid injection.
To address these challenges, the industry and regulatory agencies have implemented a range of measures, such as better management of produced water and drilling fluids, tighter regulations on air emissions, and improved well construction and design to reduce the risk of groundwater contamination. However, environmental concerns continue to be a topic of debate and concern among stakeholders in the Haynesville and other shale plays.
What mergers and acquisitions have occurred?
The Haynesville shale play has seen a number of mergers and acquisitions over the years as companies have sought to expand their positions in the play and take advantage of its potential.
In 2014, Chesapeake Energy acquired Vine Oil and Gas, a major player in the Haynesville shale, for $1.26 billion. The acquisition added over 400,000 net acres to Chesapeake's position in the Haynesville and made it one of the largest operators in the play.
In 2018, EXCO Resources acquired BHP Billiton's Haynesville shale assets for $300 million. The acquisition included over 100,000 net acres in the play and made EXCO one of the largest operators in the area.
In 2019, Comstock Resources acquired Covey Park Energy, a major player in the Haynesville, for $2.2 billion. The acquisition added over 600,000 net acres to Comstock's position in the play and made it one of the largest operators in the area.
In 2021, Southwestern Energy acquired Indigo Natural Resources, a private company with significant operations in the Haynesville, for $2.7 billion. The acquisition added over 375,000 net acres to Southwestern's position in the play and made it the largest producer in the area.
These are just a few examples of the mergers and acquisitions that have taken place in the Haynesville shale play over the years. The consolidation of acreage and assets by larger companies has helped to drive efficiency and reduce costs in the play, while also contributing to the overall growth and development of the area.
The oil and gas industry is constantly seeking new technologies to improve efficiency and productivity in the Haynesville shale play. Companies are using advanced drilling techniques such as horizontal drilling and multi-stage hydraulic fracturing to access more of the reservoir and maximize production. In addition, new completion techniques such as "plug and perf" and "slickwater" fracturing are being used to optimize well performance.
Companies are using artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms to analyze data from drilling and completion operations, identify trends and patterns, and make more informed decisions about how to optimize production and reduce costs.
The use of digital technologies such as sensors, automation, and robotics is becoming more widespread in the industry, allowing companies to monitor and control drilling and production operations in real-time, improve safety and efficiency, and reduce costs.
Companies are using advanced data analytics and visualization tools to better understand reservoir characteristics and production performance, optimize well spacing and completion designs, and identify opportunities for further cost reductions and efficiency gains.
The industry is increasingly focused on reducing emissions from drilling and production operations and is exploring a range of low-emission technologies such as electrification, hydrogen fuel cells, and carbon capture and storage (CCS) to achieve this goal.
These are just a few examples of the technologies being implemented by companies in the Haynesville shale play to achieve maximum efficiency and productivity. As technology continues to evolve, it is likely that new and even more innovative solutions will emerge in the years to come.
Also, it is located in close proximity to major demand centers in the Gulf Coast region, including the growing liquefied natural gas (LNG) export market. This makes it a valuable source of supply for both domestic and
If you are looking for more information about energy companies, their assets, and energy deals, please, contact our sales office mapping@hartenergy.com, Tel. 619-349-4970 or SCHEDULE A DEMO to learn how Rextag can help you leverage energy data for your business.
Haynesville's Top 2022 Players That Made It Happen
After reaching record-high production in 2021, the Haynesville Shale seemed to have a quiet 2022, with a smattering of deal activity and attention seemingly focused more on LNG exports than production. Meanwhile, the indications are that the third-largest producing gas shale in the U.S. is growing up for a robust 2023 if commodity prices stand still. Top basin performers Chesapeake Energy, Southwestern Energy, Comstock Resources, Aethon Energy, and Rockcliff Energy II produced a combined total of 1.53 MMboe/d, 83 bbl/d of oil, and 9.2 Bcf/d of gas in the first half of 2022.
WhiteHawk Energy Expands Portfolio with $54 Million Marcellus Shale Natural Gas Asset Purchase
WhiteHawk Energy has recently completed a significant acquisition in the Marcellus Shale, investing $54 million. This deal has effectively doubled their mineral and royalty ownership in the Marcellus Shale, particularly in Greene and Washington counties in Pennsylvania. This region is noted for its high-quality natural gas reserves. WhiteHawk’s Marcellus assets now encompass approximately 475,000 gross unit acres, featuring production from about 1,315 horizontal shale wells. In addition to this, they own interests in 72 wells-in-progress, 64 permitted wells, and nearly 900 undeveloped Marcellus locations. This acquisition is expected to double WhiteHawk's net revenue interest in each well within its Marcellus holdings.
As world leaders gather at the COP29 climate summit, a surprising trend is emerging: some of the biggest oil companies are scaling back their renewable energy efforts. Why? The answer is simple—profits. Fossil fuels deliver higher returns than renewables, reshaping priorities across the energy industry.
The global oil market is full of potential but also fraught with challenges. Demand and production are climbing to impressive levels, yet prices remain surprisingly low. What’s driving these mixed signals, and what role does the U.S. play?
Shell overturned a landmark court order demanding it cut emissions by nearly half. Is this a victory for Big Oil or just a delay in the climate accountability movement?