Comprehensive Energy Data Intelligence

Information About Energy Companies, Their Assets, Market Deals, Industry Documents and More...


The Haynesville oil and gas basin is a significant shale gas-producing region located primarily in northwest Louisiana and eastern Texas in the United Statesб with some estimates suggesting it could contain up to 500 trillion cubic feet of recoverable natural gas.

The Haynesville basin has become a key source of natural gas production in the United States, helping to fuel the country's increasing demand for natural gas as a cleaner alternative to coal and oil. The basin's strategic location near major pipelines and liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminals has also made it an important source of natural gas for international markets.

Some of the key pipelines serving the region include:

  1. Gulf Crossing Pipeline: This pipeline spans approximately 357 miles and transports natural gas from the Barnett Shale in Texas to markets in the southeastern U.S., including Louisiana.
  2. Texas Eastern Transmission Pipeline: This pipeline stretches more than 9,000 miles and serves customers in the northeastern and southeastern U.S. It connects to the Haynesville region through several interconnects with other pipelines.
  3. Gulf South Pipeline: This pipeline spans more than 7,000 miles and transports natural gas from production areas in the Gulf Coast region to markets in the southeastern U.S.

As for the LNG export terminals, there are several located near the Haynesville region, including:

  1. Sabine Pass LNG Terminal: This terminal is located in Cameron Parish, Louisiana, and is currently the largest LNG export facility in the United States. It has a capacity of approximately 4.5 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) and is owned and operated by Cheniere Energy.
  2. Cameron LNG Terminal: This terminal is also located in Cameron Parish, Louisiana, and has a capacity of approximately 1.7 Bcf/d. It is owned by a consortium of companies, including Sempra Energy, Mitsui & Co., Total, and JERA.
  3. Freeport LNG Terminal: This terminal is located on Quintana Island, Texas, and has a capacity of approximately 2.2 Bcf/d. It is owned and operated by Freeport LNG Development, L.P.

The Haynesville shale play is one of the largest natural gas-producing basins in the United States, and it covers a significant portion of Louisiana, Texas, and Arkansas. 

The Haynesville shale play contains an estimated 304 trillion cubic feet of technically recoverable natural gas reserves, making it one of the largest natural gas plays in the United States.

According to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), natural gas production from the Haynesville shale reached a record high of 12.8 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) in December 2021, accounting for approximately 9% of total US natural gas production.

There are numerous companies operating in the Haynesville shale play, including some of the largest natural gas producers in the United States such as Chesapeake Energy, Comstock Resources, and Range Resources.

Economic impact: The development of the Haynesville shale play has brought significant economic benefits to the region, including job creation, increased tax revenue, and new business opportunities.

According to a study by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, the development of the Haynesville shale play has created an estimated 57,000 jobs in Louisiana alone since 2008. These jobs include positions in drilling and production, as well as support services such as trucking, equipment rental, and well services.

According to the same study, the development of the Haynesville shale play has generated an estimated $9.6 billion in tax revenue for Louisiana since 2008. This revenue includes severance taxes, sales taxes, and income taxes paid by workers in the O&G industry.

The development of the Haynesville shale play has created new business opportunities in a range of industries. For example, companies that provide water treatment services, pipeline construction and maintenance, and environmental consulting have all seen increased demand as a result of the development of the Haynesville shale play.

It has also attracted significant investment from O&G companies and other investors. According to data from the Louisiana Oil and Gas Association, the Haynesville shale play has attracted more than $75 billion in investment since 2008.


In addition to its significant natural gas reserves, the Haynesville basin has also contributed to the development of advanced drilling and completion technologies, which have helped to make shale gas production more efficient and cost-effective. 

The Haynesville Basin is unique and distinct from other shale formations for a few reasons:

The Haynesville shale formation is located at a depth of over 10,000 feet, which is deeper than most other shale plays in the United States. This depth requires specific drilling and production techniques to extract natural gas from the formation.

It is also one of the thickest shale plays in the United States, with thicknesses ranging from 200 to 600 feet. This thickness allows for greater volumes of natural gas to be extracted from the formation.

The natural gas produced from the Haynesville shale is known for its high quality, with low levels of impurities such as sulfur and carbon dioxide. This high-quality natural gas is in high demand by industrial and commercial customers, as well as for use in power generation.

According to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), natural gas production from the Haynesville shale formation increased rapidly from 2010 to 2012, reaching a peak of 10.5 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) in December 2012. This growth was driven by a significant increase in the number of active drilling rigs and improvements in drilling and completion techniques.

However, production from the Haynesville shale formation declined in the following years due to a combination of low natural gas prices, high production costs, and competition from other shale plays. From 2013 to 2017, production from the Haynesville shale declined from a peak of 10.5 Bcf/d to a low of 6.4 Bcf/d.

In recent years, the development of new technologies and improved drilling and completion techniques have led to a resurgence in production from the Haynesville shale formation. According to the EIA, natural gas production from the Haynesville shale reached a new record high of 12.8 Bcf/d in December 2021, driven by an increase in drilling activity and continued improvements in technology and efficiency.

The first drillings and the firts production in the Haynesville basin

Exploration and drilling activities in the Haynesville shale began in the early 2000s, but it was not until 2008 that the first commercial production of natural gas was achieved. That year, Chesapeake Energy Corporation announced a significant natural gas discovery in the Haynesville formation in northwest Louisiana, which quickly led to a surge in drilling activity in the region.

In the years that followed, advances in drilling and completion technologies, such as hydraulic fracturing (fracking) and horizontal drilling, helped to unlock the vast reserves of natural gas in the Haynesville shale, leading to a boom in production. The peak production of natural gas in the Haynesville basin was reached in 2012, and since then, production has stabilized at a high level.

Today, the Haynesville basin remains a major source of natural gas in the United States, accounting for about 10% of the country's total natural gas production. The basin also continues to attract investment from major energy companies and has become an important contributor to the economy of the region.

The first and best-known industry players in the Haynesville basin

The Haynesville shale play in northwest Louisiana and eastern Texas has attracted a large number of industry players since its discovery, but there were a few companies that were among the first to recognize the potential of the play and make significant investments in its development.

One of the first companies to recognize the potential of the Haynesville shale was Chesapeake Energy Corporation. In 2008, Chesapeake announced a significant natural gas discovery in the Haynesville formation in northwest Louisiana, which helped to spark a surge in drilling activity in the region. Chesapeake Energy Corporation was one of the early pioneers in the development of the Haynesville shale and played a significant role in the growth of natural gas production in the region. However, the company faced significant financial challenges in the years following the shale boom, including mounting debt and declining natural gas prices, which led to bankruptcy in 2020. Today, Chesapeake Energy is a major player in the region.

Another early player in the Haynesville basin was Petrohawk Energy Corporation. In 2006, Petrohawk acquired significant acreage in the Haynesville shale and was one of the first companies to drill and complete successful wells in the play. The company was known for its aggressive drilling program and innovative use of technology to extract natural gas from shale rock. In 2011, Petrohawk was acquired by BHP Billiton, a global resources company, for $12.1 billion. Today, while Petrohawk Energy Corporation no longer exists as an independent entity, its legacy continues in the Haynesville shale as part of BHP's portfolio of assets.

Other major industry players that have been active in the Haynesville basin include ExxonMobil, BP, Royal Dutch Shell, and Range Resources, among others. These companies have invested significant resources in the development of the Haynesville shale. Ultimately, the relative leadership of these companies may depend on factors such as their financial strength, technological capabilities, and operational efficiency.

Did the unconventional drilling age change the Haynesville?

The Haynesville shale play was largely developed during the unconventional drilling age, which was characterized by advances in drilling and completion technologies that allowed for the economic extraction of oil and gas from unconventional reservoirs, such as shale formations. 

The advent of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, allowed for the efficient extraction of oil and gas from shale formations. Fracking involves injecting a mixture of water, sand, and chemicals into the well at high pressure, which fractures the shale and allows the oil and gas to flow to the surface.

Horizontal drilling technology allowed for the drilling of longer wells that could access more of the shale formation, increasing the amount of oil and gas that could be extracted from a single well.

Advances in seismic imaging technology allowed for more accurate mapping of the subsurface geology, which helped to identify areas with high concentrations of oil and gas.

As the industry gained more experience with unconventional drilling techniques, it became more efficient at drilling and completing wells, which helped to reduce costs and improve the economics of shale gas development.

With the development of fracking and horizontal drilling, oil, and gas companies are now able to access previously inaccessible shale formations, which contain vast reserves of hydrocarbons. This has led to a significant increase in domestic oil and gas production.

According to data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), U.S. crude oil production increased from 5.5 million barrels per day (b/d) in 2010 to 11.3 million b/d in 2019, largely driven by the development of shale formations using fracking and horizontal drilling. Similarly, natural gas production increased from 21.6 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) in 2010 to 34.9 Tcf in 2019, with the majority of the growth coming from shale gas production using these new technologies.

Together, these changes helped to unlock the vast reserves of natural gas in the Haynesville shale.

The development of the Haynesville shale play presented a number of technological challenges for oil and gas companies, particularly as the play matured and operators moved into more complex areas of the formation. 

As drilling activity in the Haynesville increased, operators faced the challenge of maintaining well productivity as the play became more mature. One challenge was preventing the decline of production rates over time, which required improvements in drilling and completion techniques to optimize well performance.

The cost of drilling and completing wells in the Haynesville was a major challenge for operators, particularly as the price of natural gas fluctuated. Companies sought to reduce well costs through the use of more efficient drilling and completion techniques, as well as through economies of scale.

The average cost of natural gas/oil extracted from the Haynesville and Permian basins can vary depending on a number of factors such as the specific location within each basin, the drilling and completion techniques used, and the price of oil and natural gas at the time of extraction. However, some industry estimates suggest that the average cost of natural gas extracted from the Haynesville shale play in the years 2015-2018 was around $2.50 to $3.50 per million British thermal units (MMBtu). In comparison, the average cost of natural gas extracted from the Permian basin during the same period was estimated to be around $1.50 to $2.50 per MMBtu.

The development of the Haynesville shale play raised concerns about the potential environmental impact of drilling and fracking operations. Companies worked to mitigate these impacts through improved well design and construction, better management of drilling fluids and produced water and more responsible disposal of waste materials.

As drilling activity increased in the Haynesville, safety became an important issue for operators. Companies worked to improve safety through the use of better equipment and technology, more rigorous safety training and protocols, and closer collaboration with regulatory agencies and other stakeholders.

As the Haynesville shale play became more mature, companies faced the challenge of maximizing resource recovery while minimizing costs. This required the use of advanced reservoir management techniques, such as reservoir modeling and enhanced oil recovery methods, to optimize production and recovery rates.

How did the biggest drops in production happen and why? How did the industry survive?

The Haynesville shale play, like many other shale plays, has experienced fluctuations in production over the years due to a variety of factors, including changes in natural gas prices, drilling activity levels, and technological advancements. 

In 2012 and 2013, natural gas prices dropped sharply, which led to a decline in drilling activity in the Haynesville and a corresponding drop in production. The industry responded by reducing costs through layoffs, lower drilling rates, and more efficient drilling and completion techniques. Some companies also diversified their portfolios by investing in oil and other liquids-rich plays. However, some industry estimates suggest that companies were able to reduce their drilling and completion costs in the Haynesville shale play by up to 30-40% through the use of more efficient techniques and economies of scale.

In 2015, natural gas prices once again dropped, leading to a decline in drilling activity in the Haynesville and a corresponding drop in production. The industry responded by further reducing costs, improving drilling and completion efficiency, and investing in technologies such as data analytics and automation to improve productivity and reduce costs.

In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic led to a sharp drop in demand for natural gas, which caused prices to plummet and led to a decline in drilling activity in the Haynesville and other shale plays. The industry responded by reducing drilling activity and focusing on the most productive wells in order to maintain profitability.

In addition, many companies have diversified their portfolios by investing in oil and other liquids-rich plays, which can help to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in natural gas prices.

Has the Haynesville basin faced any environmental challenges?

The development of the Haynesville shale play has raised a number of environmental challenges, including:

Hydraulic fracturing requires large amounts of water, which can put a strain on local water resources. In addition, there have been concerns about the potential for fracking fluids and produced water to contaminate groundwater and surface water sources.

The drilling and completion of wells can release air pollutants such as volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), which can contribute to smog and other air quality problems.

TT The Haynesville shale and Permian Basin both face similar challenges when it comes to the release of methane, which is a potent greenhouse gas that contributes to climate change. However, there are some differences between the two shale plays in terms of their specific challenges related to methane emissions.

One challenge for the Haynesville shale is that the geology of the formation can make it more difficult to extract natural gas without releasing methane. The shale has a high clay content, which can trap methane in the rock and make it more likely to escape during drilling and extraction. Additionally, the high pressure and temperature conditions in the Haynesville can make it more difficult to contain methane emissions.

In contrast, the Permian Basin has a higher concentration of oil and natural gas liquids compared to the Haynesville, which means that companies in the Permian may focus more on oil production rather than natural gas. This can lead to a lower overall level of methane emissions, but there are still concerns about leakage and venting during drilling and extraction activities.

Both shale plays face similar challenges when it comes to monitoring and reducing methane emissions. However, companies in the Haynesville and Permian are implementing various technologies and practices to address these issues, including the use of leak detection and repair programs, improved well design, and the implementation of best management practices.

There have been concerns about the potential for fracking operations to induce earthquakes, particularly in areas where there are faults or other geological features that can be activated by fluid injection.

To address these challenges, the industry and regulatory agencies have implemented a range of measures, such as better management of produced water and drilling fluids, tighter regulations on air emissions, and improved well construction and design to reduce the risk of groundwater contamination. However, environmental concerns continue to be a topic of debate and concern among stakeholders in the Haynesville and other shale plays.

What mergers and acquisitions have occurred?

The Haynesville shale play has seen a number of mergers and acquisitions over the years as companies have sought to expand their positions in the play and take advantage of its potential.

In 2014, Chesapeake Energy acquired Vine Oil and Gas, a major player in the Haynesville shale, for $1.26 billion. The acquisition added over 400,000 net acres to Chesapeake's position in the Haynesville and made it one of the largest operators in the play.

In 2018, EXCO Resources acquired BHP Billiton's Haynesville shale assets for $300 million. The acquisition included over 100,000 net acres in the play and made EXCO one of the largest operators in the area.

In 2019, Comstock Resources acquired Covey Park Energy, a major player in the Haynesville, for $2.2 billion. The acquisition added over 600,000 net acres to Comstock's position in the play and made it one of the largest operators in the area.

In 2021, Southwestern Energy acquired Indigo Natural Resources, a private company with significant operations in the Haynesville, for $2.7 billion. The acquisition added over 375,000 net acres to Southwestern's position in the play and made it the largest producer in the area.

These are just a few examples of the mergers and acquisitions that have taken place in the Haynesville shale play over the years. The consolidation of acreage and assets by larger companies has helped to drive efficiency and reduce costs in the play, while also contributing to the overall growth and development of the area.

The oil and gas industry is constantly seeking new technologies to improve efficiency and productivity in the Haynesville shale play. Companies are using advanced drilling techniques such as horizontal drilling and multi-stage hydraulic fracturing to access more of the reservoir and maximize production. In addition, new completion techniques such as "plug and perf" and "slickwater" fracturing are being used to optimize well performance.

Companies are using artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms to analyze data from drilling and completion operations, identify trends and patterns, and make more informed decisions about how to optimize production and reduce costs.

The use of digital technologies such as sensors, automation, and robotics is becoming more widespread in the industry, allowing companies to monitor and control drilling and production operations in real-time, improve safety and efficiency, and reduce costs.

Companies are using advanced data analytics and visualization tools to better understand reservoir characteristics and production performance, optimize well spacing and completion designs, and identify opportunities for further cost reductions and efficiency gains.

The industry is increasingly focused on reducing emissions from drilling and production operations and is exploring a range of low-emission technologies such as electrification, hydrogen fuel cells, and carbon capture and storage (CCS) to achieve this goal.

These are just a few examples of the technologies being implemented by companies in the Haynesville shale play to achieve maximum efficiency and productivity. As technology continues to evolve, it is likely that new and even more innovative solutions will emerge in the years to come.

Also, it is located in close proximity to major demand centers in the Gulf Coast region, including the growing liquefied natural gas (LNG) export market. This makes it a valuable source of supply for both domestic and

If you are looking for more information about energy companies, their assets, and energy deals, please, contact our sales office, Tel. 619-349-4970 or SCHEDULE A DEMO to learn how Rextag can help you leverage energy data for your business.


Haynesville's Top 2022 Players That Made It Happen


After reaching record-high production in 2021, the Haynesville Shale seemed to have a quiet 2022, with a smattering of deal activity and attention seemingly focused more on LNG exports than production. Meanwhile, the indications are that the third-largest producing gas shale in the U.S. is growing up for a robust 2023 if commodity prices stand still. Top basin performers Chesapeake Energy, Southwestern Energy, Comstock Resources, Aethon Energy, and Rockcliff Energy II produced a combined total of 1.53 MMboe/d, 83 bbl/d of oil, and 9.2 Bcf/d of gas in the first half of 2022.

Restructuration is in a full-speed: Comstock to sell Bakken for $154 million

Comstock Resources decided to go through with asset divestment, selling its Bakken Shale actives for $150M to Northern Oil and Gas. The proceeds from these sales will be reinvested by Comstock Resources Inc. into the Haynesville Shale, at which point the company may acquire additional leasehold and fund drilling activities starting in 2022. Meanwhile, Northern clearly gunning for the pack leading position in the Texas shale play, but whether they succeed or not is remains to be seen.


Global oil supply and demand saw notable changes in April 2023. Liquids demand declined by 0.7 MMb/d to 99.9 MMb/d, with gains in China and Europe offset by reduced demand in Japan and the Middle East. OPEC 10 production remained stable at 29.5 MMb/d, while Saudi Arabia increased output by 0.3 MMb/d. Non-OPEC production declined slightly, Russian production dropped further, and US shale production remained steady. Combined production in Iran, Venezuela, and Libya remained unchanged. Commercial inventories increased, and OPEC+ implemented production cuts. Economic sentiment remains uncertain amid rising global inflation.


ONEOK Inc. and Magellan Midstream Partners LP have announced a merger agreement that will result in the formation of a formidable midstream company headquartered in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The deal will bring together their respective assets and expertise, resulting in a powerful entity boasting an extensive network of approximately 25,000 miles of pipelines primarily focused on transporting liquids.


Callon is set to purchase Percussion Petroleum's Delaware assets for $475 million while selling its Eagle Ford assets to Ridgemar for $655 million. In a strategic step to optimize its operations, Callon Petroleum recently made headlines by sealing two deals on May 3, totaling a staggering $1.13 billion. The company is taking confident steps to bolster its presence in the Delaware Basin while bidding farewell to its stake in the Eagle Ford Shale.

2022 oil production 2023 3D Earth Science Analytics 3D Modeling Continental Resources 3D modeling 3D modeling CGG 3D modeling ESA 3D visualization 3D visualization CGG A&D A&D deals A&D sector A&Ds in the Gulf of Mexico ANR Pipelines Abraxas Petroleum Acquisition Acquisitions Admiral Permian Resources Advance Energy Advance Energy Partners Holdings LLC Aera Energy Aethon Energy Alaska Pipeline System Alberta Align Midstream LLC Alternative Fuels Ameredev II Anadarko Basin Analysis Analytics And Rockcliff Energy Antero Midstream Corp. Antitrust Appalachia to Market and Middlesex Extension project Appalachian Appalachian Basin Appalachian basin ArcLight Capital Partners ArcLight Capital Partners LLC Archaea Energy Inc. Arena Energy LLC Artesia Natural Gas Gathering and Processing System Asia Assets Acquisition Assets Revenue Assets Sale Assets Value Atlantic Coast Pipeline Aviation emissions BHP Billiton BOED BP BP Plc BPX Energy Baker Hughes Bakken Bakken Formation Bakken Shale Bakken shale Bankruptcy Bay du Nord Baytex Energy Berkshire Hathaway Biodiesel Bison Midstream Blackstone Energy Partners Blackstone Inc. Blockchain Bloomberg Brazil Brazos Valley Brent BridgeTex Broom Creek Formation Buyout Firms CBAM CCS CGG CO2 reduction Cactus II Pipeline Callon Petroleum Canada Carbon Capture Carbon Footprints Carbon capture and storage Cardinal Midstream Partners Careers in O&G Carl Icahn Cenovus Centennial Resource Centennial Resource Development Centennial Resource Development Inc. Charlson Gathering System Cheniere Energy Cheniere Marketing Chesapeake Energy Chesapeake Energy Corp. Chesapeake Energy Corporation Chevron Chevron Corp. China China Gas Holding LTD. Chord Energy Cibolo Energy Partners Clay basin Clean Energy Climate Change Coal Colgate Energy Colgate Energy Partners Colgate Energy Partners II LLC Colgate Energy Partners III Colonial Pipeline Colorado Comisión Federal de Electricidad Comstock Resources Concho Valley Solar ConocoPhillips ConocoPhillips Co. Continental Resources Continental Resources Inc. Corpus Christi Costa Azul Coterra Energy Inc. Cox Operating LLC Credit Suisse Group Crescent Energy Crescent Point Energy Corp. Crestwood Crestwood Equity Partners Crestwood Equity Partners LP Crestwood Permian Basin Holdings LLC Crowheart Energy Crude Oil Crude Prices Crude oil D-J Basin DCP DCP Midstream DJ Basin DUCs on the Rise Dakota Access Pipeline Data Debt Restructuration Decarbonization Technology Decarbonized Fuel Delaware Delaware Basin Delaware basin DelawareBasin Denver Denver-Julesburg Basin Devon Energy Diamondback Diamondback Energy Diamondback Energy Inc. Dividends Dominion Energy Dominion Energy Questar Pipeline Double E Pipeline DoublePoint Energy DowJones Downstream Market Driftwood Energy Operating LLC Driftwood Pipeline LLC Drilling Drilling Inventory E&P EIA EIEC EIG EP Energy ESG ESG performance ESG score ESGcriteria ESGinvestment ESGstandarts Eagle Ford Eagle Ford M&As Eagle Ford Shale Earth Science Analytics Earthstone Energy Inc. East Texas Eddy County El Paso Natural Gas Pipeline Elba Liquefaction Emissions EnCap EnCap Flatrock Midstream EnCap Investments EnVen Energy Corp. Enbridge Enbridge Energy Enbridge Inc Enbridge Pipeline Encap Flatrock Midstream Endeavor Gathering Energy Energy Assets Energy Crisis Energy Gas Energy Information Administration Energy Infrastructure Energy M&A deals 2022 Energy M&As Energy Prices Energy Production Energy Projects Energy Security Energy Transfer Energy Transfer LP Energy Transport Solutions Energy security Enerplus Ensign Natural Resources Enterprise Enterprise Product Operating LLC Enterprise Products Partners Environmental Protection Agency Epic Crude Pipeline Equinor Equinor Energy Ireland Equitrans Midstream Corp. Equity Investments Ethanol Conversion Europe Evolution Petroleum Exaro Energy III Exploration Export Exxon Mobil Exxon Mobil Corp. ExxonMobil FireBird Energy FireBird Energy LLC Flowing Gas Forecast Fort McMurray FortunaResources G&P GIS GIS NG data GIS U.S. GIS U.S. NG Data GIS U.S. NG data GIS U.S. data Gas Gas Extraction Gas Flaring Gas Holdings Gas Processing Plants Gas Production Gas Rates Gas processing Gathering Gathering and Processing Gathering and Transportation Network Gemini Carthage Glencore Global Emissions Goldman Sachs Goodrich Grand Prix NGL Pipeline Gray Oak Pipeline Great River Hydro LLC Great Western Petroleum Greater Green River Green River Basin Greenhouse Gas Emissions Gulf Coast Gulf Coast Pipeline System Gulf Oil Corporation Gulf Run Pipeline map Gulf of Mexico Guyana HartEnergy Harvest Midstream Haynesville Haynesville Basin Haynesville Shale Heavy crude Hess Hilcorp Energy Horizontal Well Humble Midstream Hydraulically Stimulated Resources Hydro-Québec Hydrocarbon Exploration Hydrocarbon Reservoirs Hydrogen IEA IKAV INEOS Energy IPO Import Inc. India Infrastructure International Energy Agency Iran Ironwood Midstream JUSTCapital Japan Joint Venture Jonah Field Jordan Cove KAPS KKR KKR&Co. Karnes Trough Kaybob Duvernay Key Access Pipeline System Key statistics Keyera Corp Keystone XL Pipeline Kinder Morgan Kinder Morgan Inc. Kirkuk oil Komipo America LEG project LNG LNG Delivery LNG Demand LNG Terminals LNG delivery LNG exports LNG plant LNG provider LNG-by-rail LP LaBarge Labrador Lake Charles Project Laredo Petroleum Lario Permian Lario Permian LLC Lea County Leasehold Properties Leucrotta Exploration Libya Lime Rock Resources Line 3 Pipeline Line 3 project Liquefaction Plant Liquefied Natural Gas Liquefied natural gas Liquids and Natural Gas Pipelines LongHorn Lotus Midstream Louisiana Lucid Energy Group M&A M&As MLPs MPLX LP Magellan Magellan Midstream Magellan Midstream Partners Mainline Pipeline System Mancos Shale Marathon Marathon Oil Marathon Oil Corp. Marathon Oil Corporation Marathon Petroleum Marcellus Shale Marcellus region Mariner East Project Mariner east expansion Market Acquisition Of Vine Energy Inc. Mascot Project Matador Matador Resources Matador Resources Co Matagorda Medallion Midstream Services Medallion Pipeline Merge Merger Merit SI Methane Emissions Mewbourne Oil Co. Mexico MiQ Mica Midcoast Energy LLC Midcontinent Middle East Midland Midland Basin Midland-Petro D.C. Partners LLC MidlandBasin Midstream Midstream M&As Midstream NG gathering pipelines Midwest Momentum Midstream LLC Monopoly Mont Belvieu Montana Montney Shale Motiva Enterprises Mountain Valley MountainWest Pipeline Mountrail Gathering System NG Pipeline Maps NG U.S. midstream data NG data NG data U.S. NG gathering pipeline systems NG pipeline maps NG3 NGL NGL Energy Partners NGL export NGL logistics NGL pipelines NGL production NGLs NGO NGP NLG NZE Natural Gas Natural Gas Assets Natural Gas Certification Natural Gas Equivalent Natural Gas Gathering Natural Gas Infrastructure Natural Gas Liquids Infrastructure Natural Gas Prices Natural Gas Production Natural Gas Products Natural gas pipelines Natural gas production Navitas Midstream Net Acres Net-zero Production New Fortress New Jersey New Mexico Newco Newfoundland Noble Energy Noble Midstream Partners LP Non-Operated Assets North Dakota North-East Northern Delaware Basin Northern Oil and Gas Northern Oil and Gas Inc. Nuevo Midstream O&G O&G Production O&G output records O&G production O&G production forecasting ONEOK ONEOK Bakken OPEC OPEC+ Oasis Midstream Partners Oasis Petroleum Oasis Petroleum Inc. Offshore Oil Oil & Gas Oil Equivalent Oil Prices Oil Sanctions Oil and Gas Oil and Gas Production Oil and Gas Properties Oil and Gas production Oil and Gas rigs Oil and gas production Oil companies Oil&Gas Oklahoma Omega Acquisition Inc. Onshore Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Operated Wells Orphan Basin Oryx Outrigger DJ Outrigger DJ midstream Ovintiv Oxy PAM PDC Energy PHMSA Pad Activity Monitor Paradigm Paradox Basin Paramount Resources Ltd. Pearl Energy Investments Pecos Oil & Gas Pecos Oil & Gas LLC Pecos River processing plant Pembina Pembina Pipeline Corp. Penn Virginia PennEast Pipeline PennEnergy Resources LLC Pennsylvania Percussion Petroleum Permian Permian Basin Permian Basin 2022 Permian Deep Rock Oil Co. Permian Producers Permian Resource Corp. Permian Resources Permian Resources Corp. Permian acreage sale Permian basin PermianBasin PermianResources Petro-Hunt Petrochemical production Petroleum Petroleum Production Phillips 66 Piceance Pickering Energy PickeringEnergy Pine Wave Energy Partners Pinnacle Midstream Pioneer Natural Resources Pipeline Pipeline Maps Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipelines Pipelines and Refineries Plains Plains All American Powder River Powder River Basin Power Generation Power Plant Fuel Power River basin Processing plants Production Production Forecast Propane PureWest Quantum Energy Partners Quantum Technology Questar Pipeline RNG RSG Ranger Oil Rattler Midstream Reagan county Red Trail Energy RedBird Capital Partners Reduction of Greenhouse Emissions Reeves County Renewable Renewable Diesel Renewable Energy Group Repsol Research Responsibly Sourced Gas Rextag Ridgemar Energy Riley Exploration Riley Exploration Permian Inc. RimRock Ring Energy Inc. RiverBasin Riverstone Rockcliff Energy Rockies Express Pipeline Rocky Mountains Rocky mountain Russia SAF SHLX SPA Sabine Pass LNG LP San Andres formation San Mateo SandRidge Saudi Arabia Schneider Digital Sempra Energy Sendero Midstream Sequestration Shale Shale Field Shale Formation Shale Gas Shale Industry Shale Oil Producer Shareholder Returns Shares Shell Shell Midstream Partners Shell Oil Company Shell Plc. Shell UAS Sierra Grande Silver Hill Energy Partners III Sinochem Group Sour crude South Carlsbad Natural Gas Gathering System South Haynesville Basin Southcross Energy Southeast Gateway Southern Access expansion Southern Lights Pipeline Southwest Gas Southwest Gas Holdings Southwestern Energy Spain Spraberry Formation Standard Oil of New Jersey Standing Rock Indian Reservation Steel Reef Infrastructure Corp. Sterling DJ Sterling DJ system Stock Market Stonepeak Partners LP Stonepeak Partners. Strategic Petroleum Reserve Strategic Resources Stronghold Energy Summit Midstream Summit Midstream Holdings Summit Midstream Partners Summit Midstream Partners LP Summit’s Lane System Sunrise Oil Sands TAPS TC Energy TC Energy Corp. TC PipeLines LP TG Natural Resources THQ Appalachia Tailwater Capital Takeaway Tallgrass Energy Talos Energy Inc. TalosEnergy Targa Resources Targa Resources Corp. Tesoro High Plains Pipeline Tesoro Logistics Texas Texon Oil and Land Company The Appalachian Basin The Denver-Julesburg Basin The Permian Basin The United States Titus Oil & Gas Production LLC Tokyo Gas Co. Ltd. TokyoGas TotalEnergies Trace Midstream TransCanada Transport Permit Transportation Infrastructure Tres Palacios Truist Securities Tug Hill Operating U.S. U.S. Gulf Coast U.S. LNG exports U.S. NG data U.S. NG midstream data U.S. NG upstream U.S. NG upstream data U.S. crude exports U.S. crude oil data U.S. energy U.S. energy M&A U.S. energy data U.S. energy industry U.S. energy maps U.S. hydrogen production U.S. midstream data U.S. refineries U.S. shale gas assets U.S. upstream data US NG US gas US oil USA USgas USoil Uinta Uinta Basin Ukraine Upstream Upstream M&As Upstream companies Upton county Utah Van Hook Gathering System Venezuela Vermilion Energy Vermont Business Magazine HQI US Holding LLC Vista Pacifico Vital Energy Inc. WCS WTI Waha Hub Wamsutter Field War Warburg Pincus Water Management Water management Webinar Webster Pipeline Well maps Wells West Texas Western Canada Select Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin White House Whiting Whiting Petroleum Wholesale WildFire Energy I LLC William Companies Williams Williston Williston Basin Willston basin Wolfcamp Formation Woodland Midstream II Wyoming XcL Midstream Zacks Consensus Zephyr Energy Acquisition Acquisitions Acreage Acreage maps Acreage sale Acreage sales Acreage valuation Analytics And Phillips 66 Partners And Rockcliff Energy Asset renewal Asset sale Assets merger Atural gas gathering Aviation Aviation fuel Barrel Barrels Bbl Bioenergy Bioethanol Carbon capture and storage Carbon capture storage (CCS) Carbon emissions Carbon footprint Carbon-free Cash Crude Crude export terminals Crude exports to Europe Crude oil Crude oil and natural gas output Crude oil delivery Crude oil production Deal Divestitures Divestment Drilling activity Drilling permits Dry gas Ecology Efficiency Electrification Emission reduction Emissions Emissions reduction Energy Energy M&A Energy acquisitions Energy deals Energy infrastructure Energy maps Energy market Energy provider Energy services Energy supplies Energy transfer Environment Expansion Exploration Exploration & production Financial results Flaring gas Forecast Fuel Gas Gas prices Gas projects Gathering systems Geologic CO2 storage Global energy system Green energy Greenhouse gas Greenhouse-gas emissions Growth Horizontal drilling Hydraulic fracturing (fracking) technology Hydrogen pipeline maps Industry Investment Liquefied natural gas Liquified natural gas Low emissions Low-carbon fuel Management Map of pipelines Master limited partnership Merger Merger and acquisition Mergers Midstream Midstream footprint Midstream infrastructure Natural gas Natural gas gathering and processing Natural gas maps Natural gas pipelines Natural gas producer Natural gas production Offshore oil and gas Oil Oil & gas Oil and energy Oil and natural gas assets Oil demand Oil market Oil output Oil prices Oil producers Oil rigs Oil supply Onshore Partnership Petroleum Petroleum infrastructure Pipeline Pipeline maps Processing plants Produced water Rating Rebranding Refinery Renewable energy Renewable energy sources Renewable natural gas Report Simulation Smart contract Smart contracts Software Standards Stock Subsurface CO2 sequestration Subsurface characterization Surface Sustainability The James Lake System The Permian Basin Transaction Transactions Undrilled locations Upstream Upstream production Water management Well maps Well redevelopment Wells Wet gas Wind energy