FERC's Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Entrega Gas Pipeline Inc's Entrega Pipeline Project under CP04-413. Part 1of 2.

C 0 ~mo m ~. ;ii~z-~i: ~ i ........ t; : , .. o ID :.. m ~ --h 0 ' ~ m I ..~ ~~ C3 _ ~ 0 t~ c~ (1) 0 0 Z ~ o m 0 o ol ITI 0 ~"0 o I-A o I -n -n c 0 0 0 "~ gl Z co 6 0 ~I '=4" ~D H nr m --.I ~D ~ :~ --" C 33 0 0 ID mm 3 on ~ o 0 C3 "~ 33O o 0 o 0 \\ C_ 01 o mll :~ m o u1 0 I-I. t~ 0 ~0: i~ ~.... ~i,,i 0h" 0 c1" o i ht~ .~. I ht~ i-i L0 I o o o Jnofflclal FERC-Generated PDF of 20050301-0191 Issued by FERC OSEC 02/25/2005 in D o c k e t # : C P 0 4 - 4 1 3 - 0 0 0 FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON. D.C. 20426 OFFICEOFENERGYPROJECTS In Reply Refer To: OEP/DEER/Gas Group 1 Entrega Gas Pipeline Inc. Docket Nos. CP04-413-000, et al. BLM Reference No. WYW-158830 TO THE PARTY ADDRESSED: The environmental staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) has prepared this draft Env'u'onmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the interstate natural gas pipeline transmission facilities proposed by Enu'cga Gas Pipeline Inc. (Entrega) in the above- referenced dockets. This draft EIS was prepared to satisfy the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Its purpose is to inform the Commission, the public, and other permitting agencies about the potential adverse and beneficial environmental impacts associated with the proposed project and its alternatives, and to recommended practical, reasonable, and appropriate mitigation measures which would avoid or reduce any significant adverse impacts to the maximum extent practicable and, where feasible, to less than significant levels. The draft EIS concluded that the proposed project, with the potential except/on of two route segments (the Piceance Basin Expansion Route Alternative and the Cheyenne Hub Variations), and with appropriate mitigating measures as recommended, would have limited adverse environmental impact. Additional public input is specifically being sought on these two segments to complete the routing analysis for the final EIS. The U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of[And Management (BLM) is participating as a cooperating agency in the preparation of this draft EIS because the project would cross federal lands under BLM administration in Wyoming and Colorado. The draft EIS will be used by the BLM to consider the issuance of a fight-of-way (ROW) grant for the portion of the project on all federal lands. While the conclusions and recommendations presented in this draft EIS were developed with input from the BLM as a cooperating agency, the BLM will present ...