Real-Time Visibility into the American Well Pad
Move beyond delayed permitting data with AI-driven radar detection of every drilling rig and frac crew in the continental U.S.
- Weekly detection cycles
- 100% US coverage
AI algorithm evaluates electromagnetic signatures every 72 hours.
Stop Waiting for Public Records to Catch Up.
Traditional well permits tell you where activity might happen. Our AI tells you where it is happening right now.
-
Eliminate blind spots between permitting and production.
-
Identify competitor movements weeks before public databases.
-
Gain ground-truth certainty.
Where AI Speed Meets Human Precision
Human-in-the-loop verification ensures enterprise-grade accuracy.
1. Electromagnetic Signature Detected
2. AI Screening & Confidence Scoring
3. Expert Verified
We combine complex SAR* radar algorithms with human expert verification to ensure the highest confidence in every detection.
Synthetic Aperture Radar
Monitor Today's Rigs. Predict Tomorrow's Trends
Toggle Seamlessly Between Two Powerful Views
The Active Layer
- Pinpoint the absolute latest rig and frac crew field detections
- Track live operations
The Historical Layer
- Analyze historical drilling patterns
- Track competitor activity over time
Data Purpose-Built for Your Specific Mission
Supporting E&P, Midstream, and Service Providers with ground-truth data.
Upstream E&P
- Monitor competitor movement
- Anticipate production shifts
Midstream
- Predict future flows
- Optimize take-away capacity planning
Service Providers:
- Deploy crews precisely where drilling and completion activity peaks
Rextag Rig & Frac Crew Activity Tracker: Our Methodology
Our methodology combines satellite intelligence, AI detection, and expert validation to deliver the most complete view of field activity available.
Traditional Surveys
-
Operator reporting
Field rep network / surveys
-
Coverage
Enrolled contacts only
-
Weekly updates
Once per week
-
Known limitation
Undercounting activity
GPS Tracking Providers
-
Hardware enrollment
GPS-equipped rigs only
-
Coverage
GPS-equipped rigs only
-
Daily updates
Near real-time visibility
-
Known limitation
Not all rigs are tracked
Rextag Methodology
-
Independent satellite observation
All well pads, all operators
-
Coverage
All well pads, all operators
-
Weekly validated intelligence
Human-reviewed before publication
-
Known limitation
Rig vs Frac not distinguished
Why Rextag?
| Feature | Traditional Data | Rextag |
|---|---|---|
| Survey-based Relies on surveys and self-reported data | ||
| GPS dependent Requires hardware enrollment | ||
| Human reviewed Expert validation before publication | ||
| Captures drilling Detects active rig and frac activity | Limited | |
| Missed activity Risk of undercounting field operations | Higher | Lower |
Rextag Rig & Frac Crew Activity Tracker: Our Methodology
How We Count — and Why It Matters
Not all rig counts are created equal. The way drilling activity is measured determines how complete, how accurate, and how actionable the data is. Understanding the differences between methodologies helps explain why some counts consistently underreport activity, and why Rextag built its approach to solve that problem.
The Traditional Baker Hughes Survey Approach
The longest-running rig count in the industry, Baker Hughes, published since 1944, is built on a network of field representatives who maintain direct contact with drilling crews and operators across their districts. A rig qualifies as active if it is physically on location and drilling, defined as "turning to the right," for at least four out of seven days in a given week. The count window begins at spud and ends at total depth.
This approach has real strengths: it produces a consistent, long-running time series with clearly defined criteria. The fundamental limitation, however, is coverage. The data depends on voluntary communication and human reporting across a distributed network of contacts. Not every operator reports, not every survey gets returned, and not every rig in the field is captured in a given week. The result is a count that is widely acknowledged to underreport actual drilling activity, particularly among smaller operators and in less-trafficked basins.
The GPS Tracking Approach
Some providers have moved beyond survey-based counting by equipping rigs with proprietary GPS units, enabling daily location tracking and near-real-time activity monitoring. This is a meaningful improvement in timeliness and precision. When a rig has a GPS unit on it, its location and movement are known, and updates can be published daily rather than weekly.
The constraint is participation. GPS coverage is limited to rigs that have been enrolled in the tracking network. Rigs operating outside that enrolled fleet are invisible to the system or must be tracked through supplemental methods. Coverage is strong where participation is strong, but gaps exist wherever hardware has not been deployed.
The Rextag Approach: SAR Satellite Imagery + AI Detection & Human Validation
Rextag's activity tracker takes a fundamentally different approach, one that is independent of industry participation, voluntary reporting, or hardware deployment agreements.
Our system analyzes Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) satellite imagery across U.S. well pad locations. SAR is a radar-based imaging technology that operates regardless of weather conditions or time of day, providing consistent coverage across the full geographic footprint of U.S. drilling activity. We apply a proprietary AI detection algorithm trained to identify the radar signatures associated with active surface equipment, specifically the large mechanical footprint generated by a drilling rig or a frac crew on location.
Because our detection is driven by satellite observation rather than self-reporting or hardware enrollment, our coverage does not depend on who is willing to share data or who has installed a GPS unit. Every well pad in our coverage area is subject to the same detection methodology, regardless of operator, drilling contractor, or service provider.
Comparative validation confirms that Rextag's methodology captures all activity detected by survey and GPS-based approaches, and more. We consistently identify active locations that do not appear in other published counts.
A Note on Transparency
At the resolution of the SAR imagery we use today, our algorithm detects significant surface mechanical activity at a well pad but cannot always distinguish between a drilling rig and a frac crew. Both generate a detectable radar signature. As a result, our reported count reflects combined drilling and completion activity and will run modestly higher than a pure drilling-only count.
Every location in our count has been reviewed and confirmed by a member of our team before publication. We do not publish algorithmically flagged locations without human sign-off. The practical implication: Rextag's count is likely to be slightly above a pure drilling-only count than to miss active locations. We may include some frac crews alongside drilling rigs. We are very unlikely to miss either. For customers who need confidence that no significant activity is going undetected, that is the right trade-off.