The Challenge 

A mid-market private equity firm was assessing the acquisition of a regional gas midstream company operating  in  Oklahoma and the Texas Panhandle. 


The seller’s asking price assumed a steady utilization of its transmission system and potential upside from connecting to new power demand centers. The buyer’s concern was simple: did the network truly sit in a growth corridor, or was it an over-aged asset base surrounded by competition and stranded lines? 


The due diligence team — led by a VP of Infrastructure Investments and supported by three analysts and an external GIS consultant — needed to validate: 


  • Which pipelines were operational versus abandoned, 
  • Where the system tied into existing infrastructure, 
  • Whether nearby processing plants had spare throughput 
  • If power demand or data center build-outs could justify future expansion, and 
  • Visualize how historical contracting has changed over the pipeline’s life.


Public filings and operator maps were incomplete. Many segments had uncertain status, and ownership of some lateral lines had changed hands multiple times. Manually reconciling these sources would have taken 3–4 weeks. 

The Solution 

 Using Rextag Energy DataLink, the team overlaid multiple datasets to reconstruct the full picture in hours. They mapped the pipeline and gas infrastructure network against Rextag’s verified pipeline, processing plant, and power infrastructure layers, identifying where the target’s system overlapped with underutilized corridors.  


They also identified three competing systems within a 20-mile radius, two of which had direct ties to higher-capacity transmission lines — explaining recent shipper losses not disclosed in management presentations. 


The overlay of Rextag’s upstream well activity showed drilling intensity in the area had plateaued, suggesting limited future volume growth. Conversely, a planned 200-MW data center site identified in Rextag’s power dataset was within 15 miles of one compressor station, offering a potential off-take opportunity if the acquirer pursued co-development. 

Business Impact 

By consolidating infrastructure, ownership, and development data, the investment team validated that the seller’s growth assumptions were overstated. 
They refined their valuation model, reducing projected throughput by 18%, and ultimately negotiated a 12% price adjustment.

Check Circle Svgrepo.Com

Days Instead of Weeks

Check Circle Svgrepo.Com

No Fragmented Consultant Reports

Check Circle Svgrepo.Com

Clear Visibility Into Risks and Hidden Scenarios

Here’s How Rextag Helped the Team with Their Workflow 

Map Assets Icon 82939cf5 6dda 4974 92f3 2cd5f0aa0654

Map comparable assets

Locate transmission systems owned by competitors to benchmark coverage and connectivity. 

Validate Pipeline Icon A693c9fe 4bda 4b97 Baa7 B756e3f496f8

Validate pipeline status and ownership 

Differentiate operational versus abandoned lines and confirm operator changes across the region. 

Cross Asset Icon 0c5b278e 2961 4384 97a7 8e28c77caf9e

Overlay infrastructure layers 

Cross-reference pipelines, compressor stations, processing plants, and power infrastructure in one view. 

Growth Chart Icon C3a0bf0d 040e 467a Bb8f 6561a3fc353e

Assess regional production trends

Visualize active drilling and well completions to gauge future throughput potential. 

Analyze Pipeline Icon 4bd7c208 8e7d 42ee 87a0 469bd791b9c7

Analyze pipeline utilization

Contract Icon 85740bf4 3814 4248 95b7 D81b52b3e06b

Contract with trends in tariff rates and recontracting risk

Identify Demand Icon 602606d3 394b 4a8e Ab0d 50670f37a109

Identify demand drivers

Spot nearby power generation, industrial loads, or planned data centers that could influence asset value.

Higher Export Capacity

Export annotated maps 

Share verified asset views with partners, valuation consultants, and investment committees. 

Scenario2