Complaint of PBF Holding Company LLC and Toledo Refining Company LLC against Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership under OR12- 14.

20120514-0001 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 05/11/2012

PUBLIC VERSION PROTECTED MATERIALS HAVE BEEN REDACTED

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATION COMMISSION

PBF Holding Company LLC and

Toledo Refining Company LLC,

Complainants

Docket No. OR12-~l

Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership,

Respondent

COMPLAINT OF PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

AND TOLEDO REFINING COMPANY LLC

Jeffrey Dill Marcus W. Sisk, Jr.

Senior Vice President, General Counsel Frederick G. Jauss IV

PBF Holding Company LLC Dorsey k Whitney LLP

One Sylvan Way 1801 K Street, N. W. , Suite 750

2nd floor Washington, D. C. 20006

Parsippany, NJ 07054-3887 202-442-3000

973 455-7500 sisk. marcus@dorsey. corn

jdill@pb fenergy. corn jauss. fred@dorsey. corn

Attorneys for PBF Holding Company LLC

and Toledo Refining Company LLC

May 11, 2012

20120514-0001 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 05/11/2012

PUBLIC VERSION PROTECTED MATERIALS HAVE BEEN REDACTED

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATION COMMISSION

PBF Holding Company LLC and

Toledo Refining Company LLC,

Complainants

Docket No. OR12-

Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership,

Respondent

COMPLAINT OF PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

AND TOLEDO REFINING COMPANY LLC

1. Pursuant to sections 1(6), 3(1), 13(1), 15(1), and 16(1) of the Interstate

Commerce Act ("ICA"), 49 U. S.C. App. tj( 1(6), 3(1), 9, 13(l), 15(l), and 16(1), Rule

206 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 C.F.R. tj 385.206, and

section 343. 1(a) of the Commission's Procedural Rules Applicable to Oil Pipeline

Proceedings, 18 C.F.R. tj 343. 1(a), PBF Holding Company LLC and its subsidiary

Toledo Refining Company LLC (collectively "PBF")hereby submit this Complaint

against Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership ("Enbridge Energy" ). This Complaint

demonstrates that the procedures and practices of Enbridge Energy in apportioning

capacity on its "Mainline" crude oil pipeline system constitute an unjust and

unreasonable classification and practice and result in an undue and unjust preference for

shippers and users of heavy crude oil and undue and unjust discrimination against

20120514-0001 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 05/11/2012

PUBLIC VERSION PROTECTED MATERIALS HAVE BEEN REDACTED

Standing

4. PBF has standing to bring this Complaint. Under the ICA and the

Commission's Procedural Rules, any person may bring a complaint seeking relief from

an alleged legal violation over which the Commission may have jurisdiction. ICA

tj 13(1);Rule 206(a). Because this Complaint does not involve a protest against a

proposed oil pipeline tariff, no verified statement of substantial economic interest is

required under 18 C.F.R. I'1 343.2(b). Nevertheless, the attached Affidavit of Mr. Robert

E. Foti shows that PBF has a substantial economic interest in the apportionment rules and

practices of Enbridge which are ...

For complete details, download the full document: Download

Back to blog