Exhibit CU-1 in Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline, Inc's et al proceeding under RP98-52 et al:Direct testimony of Cathleen F Meyer on behalf of City Utilities of Springfield, Missouri.

Jnofflclal FERC-Generated PDF of 20030908-0034 Received by FERC OSEC 09/05/2003 in D o c k e t # : O R 0 2 - 6 - 0 0 0 ORIGINAL P.c_. ATTORNEYS A N D COtJNSF-LORS AT LAW 1757 P STRELrT. NW. W/MSHINGTON.D.C. 2 0 0 3 6 laO~ eT'a-8740 FAX: (202) e 7 2 - e 7 4 4 r~csl =lgr September 5, 2003 Ms. Magalie R. Salas Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426 Re: Sinclair Oil Corvoration v. B P Pivelines (North America) Inc. Docket No. OR02-06-000 Dear Ms. Salas: Enclosed for filing with the Commission are an original and 14 copies of the Response of Sinclair Oil Corporation to BP Pipelines' Answer to Summary Disposition Motion. I would appreciate your date-stamping the extra copy of the documents that we have enclosed and returning it to us. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Counsel for Sinclair Oil Corooration Enclosures Jnofflclal FERC-Generated PDF of 20030908-0034 Received by FERC OSEC 09/05/2003 in D o c k e t # : O R 0 2 - 6 - 0 0 0 . ORIGINAL "I'..ED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA e.;r.'~ rile SE['prT~ .~. BP_.,POI~ T H E FEDERAL ENERGY R E G U I ~ T O R Y COMMISSION 03 SEP-S PM 2:08 /" E'DE~AL r'h~RGy REGbtATnRyCOHHISSION SINCLAIR OIL CORPORATION Complainant V. ) Docket No. OR02-6-02 ) ,m ) BP PIPELINES (NORTHAMEmCA), ) INC. ) ) Respondents ) ) R E S P O N S E OF S I N ~ OIL CORPORATION TO BP PIPELINES' ANSWER TO SUMMARY DISPOSITION MOTION This case is about denial of access. F i ~ t , denial of access by the BP p.].c, enterprise to critical pipeline links through which crude oil from Canada is shipped to American refiners in the Rocky Mountains. ~ R d l , denial of access to any cost data that could be used by a shipper to establish the just and reasonable rates for transportation on that pipeline. There is nothing in Respondent BP Pipelines (North America) Inc.'s (BP Pipelines) Answer to a Motion for Summary Disposition filed by Complainant Sinclair Oil Corporation (Sinclair) that refutes this characterization of this case, the misconduct in which BP Pipelines engaged or BP Pipelines' obligation to pay reparations to Sinclair. BP Pipelines' Answer is in fact based almost entirely on information that BP Pipelines claimed it never possessed in its responses to Sinclair and FERC Staffs data requests. Jnofficial FERC-Generated PDF of 20030908-0034 Received by FERC OSEC 09/05/2003 in D o c k e t # : O R 0 2 ...