Pipeline maps related documents
Motion for Leave to Answer and Answer of Questar Pipeline Company In Opposition to Protests under CP12-40.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSIONQuestar Pipeline Company ) Docket No. CP12-40-000MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ANSWER AND ANSWER OF QUESTAR PIPELINE COMPANY IN OPPOSITION TO PROTESTSPursuant to Rules 212 and 213 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commissions(FERC or Commission) Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 C.F.R.385.212, 385.213 (2011), Questar Pipeline Company (Questar Pipeline) hereby submitsthis Motion for Leave to Answer and Answer in Opposition to Protests (Answer) torespond to two protests to Questar Pipelines January 4, 2012 Abbreviated Application toConstruct and Modify Pipeline Facilities (Uinta Basin Project Application or ProjectApplication).The majority of interveners in this proceeding filed comments strongly supportingthe Project Application and explaining how the Uinta Basin Project (or Project)satisfies producers need for access to efficient and economic gas processing facilities fortheir liquids-rich supplies. 1 Notwithstanding this strong market support, QEP FieldServices Company (QEP) and EOG Resources, Inc. (EOG) (collectivelyProtestors) protest the Project Application, requesting that it be rejected or, in thealternative, set for evidentiary hearing before an Administrative Law Judge. 2 Protestors1 See Motions to Intervene of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, Berry Petroleum Company, Chipeta Processing LLC, Gasco Energy Inc., and Ute Energy Upstream Holdings LLC (all including similar Statement of Support sections in their motions). BP Energy Company and ConocoPhillips Company also filed motions to intervene. 2 See Motion to Intervene and Protest of QEP Field Services Company (filed Jan. 31, 2012, as supplemented on Feb. 1, 2012 and Feb. 7, 2012) (QEP Protest) and Motion to Intervene and Protest of EOG Resources, Inc. (filed Feb. 1, 2012) (EOG Protest).